Judgment · jid 1604
John Felder v Sandra Hill
G 0212 OF 2019 · 2021-Sep-02
The scope and application of GCR, O.19 r.9 - The legal principles under which the discretion of the Court to set aside a Default Judgment should be exercised - The importance of recognising the substantive rights of a Plaintiff duly and properly obtained in the form of a regular Judgment.
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
4XMEEL5OG9WG1FCAFC5G554709287F76AA8CEDAAC4D9F33E0F4E.pdf
4.08 MB · md5 1838415564851df4a610ba268df75f43
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1604 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3763 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0212 OF 2019 |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2021-Sep-02 |
| Subject | The scope and application of GCR, O.19 r.9 - The legal principles under which the discretion of the Court to set aside a Default Judgment should be exercised - The importance of recognising the substantive rights of a Plaintiff duly and properly obtained in the form of a regular Judgment. |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | 4XMEEL5OG9WG1FCAFC5G554709287F76AA8CEDAAC4D9F33E0F4E.pdf |
| File MD5 | 1838415564851df4a610ba268df75f43 |
| Source pipeline | csv |
Related public-register entries
-
John Felder vs Sandra Hill
2019-Dec-27