Judgment · jid 1663
In the Matter of Maples Corporate Services Limited et.al v. CIMA
G 0020 OF 2021 · 2022-Aug-24
Judicial review-application by Plaintiffs to inspect documents contained in Defendant's List of Documents- whether documents admittedly relevant- whether Court should decline to order production on case management grounds-Court's duty to promote settlement and public law proceedings-Grand Court Rules, Preamble paragraph 4.2(d), Order 24 rule 10.
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
NWR3FKBJKLZ1GBB06D350ACF068F9A914CFFD81737A34595B6A.pdf
1.76 MB · md5 840d3976949e58f4de8a972fc93cebac
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1663 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3554 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0020 OF 2021 |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2022-Aug-24 |
| Subject | Judicial review-application by Plaintiffs to inspect documents contained in Defendant's List of Documents- whether documents admittedly relevant- whether Court should decline to order production on case management grounds-Court's duty to promote settlement and public law proceedings-Grand Court Rules, Preamble paragraph 4.2(d), Order 24 rule 10. |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | NWR3FKBJKLZ1GBB06D350ACF068F9A914CFFD81737A34595B6A.pdf |
| File MD5 | 840d3976949e58f4de8a972fc93cebac |
| Source pipeline | csv |
Related public-register entries