Judgment · jid 1982
In the Matter of Xiaodu Life Technology Ltd
FSD 0227 OF 2017 (IKJ) · 2023-Mar-14
Petition under section 238 of the Companies Act- application for specific discovery by dissenter- whether forensic expert should be appointed to assist with discovery -failure by company to strictly comply with order requiring affidavit to be sworn by a duly appointed officer - whether company s disclosure process should be further verified
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
4BLZC2DDT3VI1GD446712E80C41CC1E3D4EB26A859BD23DFDAF1.pdf
291.81 KB · md5 2a5b27635bbfb294668014346eaedd1f
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1982 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3393 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0227 OF 2017 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2023-Mar-14 |
| Subject | Petition under section 238 of the Companies Act- application for specific discovery by dissenter- whether forensic expert should be appointed to assist with discovery -failure by company to strictly comply with order requiring affidavit to be sworn by a duly appointed officer - whether company s disclosure process should be further verified |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 4BLZC2DDT3VI1GD446712E80C41CC1E3D4EB26A859BD23DFDAF1.pdf |
| File MD5 | 2a5b27635bbfb294668014346eaedd1f |
| Source pipeline | csv |