Judgment · jid 2081
Fortunate Drift Limited v. Canterbury Securities Ltd
FSD 0227 OF 2018 (IKJ) · 2023-Sep-14
Cross - applications by plaintiff and defendant for enforcement and stay of previous Information Order - partial compliance - reasons for non - compliance - need for proportionate approach - jurisdiction to make ancillary orders to ensure effectiveness of post - judgment enforcement of freezing orders - Grand Court Act (2015 Revision), section 11
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
6XJUGAXX6C321H0BAHDHFD48CAB75F5639AE4B1EF9956EAEBF29.pdf
384.16 KB · md5 1ba2c30c1c7fede6dab933145c08580d
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=2081 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3326 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0227 OF 2018 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2023-Sep-14 |
| Subject | Cross - applications by plaintiff and defendant for enforcement and stay of previous Information Order - partial compliance - reasons for non - compliance - need for proportionate approach - jurisdiction to make ancillary orders to ensure effectiveness of post - judgment enforcement of freezing orders - Grand Court Act (2015 Revision), section 11 |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 6XJUGAXX6C321H0BAHDHFD48CAB75F5639AE4B1EF9956EAEBF29.pdf |
| File MD5 | 1ba2c30c1c7fede6dab933145c08580d |
| Source pipeline | csv |