Judgment · jid 2106
Principal Investing Fund I Limited et al
FSD 0268, 0269 AND 0270 OF 2021 (IKJ) · 2024-Apr-17
Costs of interim payment on account of costs application disputed solely as to quantum - amount of award midway between the amounts contended for by each side - whether costs should be treated as part of costs in the petitions - governing principles and appropriate approach - Companies Winding Up Rules (2023 Consolidation), Order 24 rule 8 (2) (b), (4)
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
34D8UQ9QQLCI1H7I62CF71399C9432A87ACAADD9D4D4408CC8C0.pdf
288.52 KB · md5 2e7798b64e458493c25fd1e8a7d0bdac
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=2106 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3179 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0268, 0269 AND 0270 OF 2021 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2024-Apr-17 |
| Subject | Costs of interim payment on account of costs application disputed solely as to quantum - amount of award midway between the amounts contended for by each side - whether costs should be treated as part of costs in the petitions - governing principles and appropriate approach - Companies Winding Up Rules (2023 Consolidation), Order 24 rule 8 (2) (b), (4) |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 34D8UQ9QQLCI1H7I62CF71399C9432A87ACAADD9D4D4408CC8C0.pdf |
| File MD5 | 2e7798b64e458493c25fd1e8a7d0bdac |
| Source pipeline | csv |