Judgment · jid 2223
In the Matter of Raiffeisen Bank International AG v Scully Royalty Ltd. et al - Ruling
FSD 0162 OF 2019 (RPJ) · 2024-Mar-19
Application for recusal by person pending challenge to the jurisdiction - whether fair minded well informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias or predetermination-evidence-law
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
6I5EXKUSBIKA1H7331C0CD5BAF44B7108E35617ACEAE01BCDC58.pdf
505.08 KB · md5 728c70ac13a868c8ec7a1a50fd01a249
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=2223 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3203 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0162 OF 2019 (RPJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2024-Mar-19 |
| Subject | Application for recusal by person pending challenge to the jurisdiction - whether fair minded well informed observer would conclude that there was a real possibility of bias or predetermination-evidence-law |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 6I5EXKUSBIKA1H7331C0CD5BAF44B7108E35617ACEAE01BCDC58.pdf |
| File MD5 | 728c70ac13a868c8ec7a1a50fd01a249 |
| Source pipeline | csv |