Judgment · jid 2528
Bradley and Anor v Frye-Chaikin - Judgment
[2025] CIGC (Civ) 5
· G 0136 OF 2016 · 2025-Jan-28
Civil procedure - whether to grant leave to appeal - whether to order stay pending appeal - Use of AI tools to produce submissions - submissions including significant hallucinations - obligation on litigant to verify accuracy of any material produced using AI tools - obligation on attorneys to identify and act upon apparent hallucinations in materials produced by opponents
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
G0136201601282025BRADLEYFRYECHAIKIN.pdf
292.23 KB · md5 a826e38e9c809997ddcd163582483557
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=2528 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=2967 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (Civ) 5 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | G 0136 OF 2016 |
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2025-Jan-28 |
| Subject | Civil procedure - whether to grant leave to appeal - whether to order stay pending appeal - Use of AI tools to produce submissions - submissions including significant hallucinations - obligation on litigant to verify accuracy of any material produced using AI tools - obligation on attorneys to identify and act upon apparent hallucinations in materials produced by opponents |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | G0136201601282025BRADLEYFRYECHAIKIN.pdf |
| File MD5 | a826e38e9c809997ddcd163582483557 |
| Source pipeline | csv |
Related public-register entries