Unicorn Biotech Ventures One Ltd v ATP III GP Ltd (No.2) - Judgment

{
    "_canary": {
        "iri": {
            "work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown",
            "expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@",
            "manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@.pdf"
        },
        "pdf": {
            "md5": "2fa1fe7be7467ec873b40fac5fa10f7f",
            "path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/25-08-14-Amazing-Elite-Group-Ltd-v-Golden-Arrow-Technology-Co-Ltd-Judgment.pdf",
            "pages": 6,
            "filename": "25-08-14-Amazing-Elite-Group-Ltd-v-Golden-Arrow-Technology-Co-Ltd-Judgment.pdf"
        },
        "errors": [],
        "extraction": {
            "model": "granite4:3b-h",
            "stats": {
                "word_count": 2331,
                "paragraph_count": 2025,
                "text_char_count": 13710
            },
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 4096,
                "output_tokens": 225,
                "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
                "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
            },
            "method": "pymupdf",
            "version": "0.2.0-akn",
            "extracted_at": "2026-05-25T05:34:00.778511+00:00"
        },
        "classification": "text_layer",
        "validation_flags": [
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "cause_number",
                "canonical_value": "FSD 0390/2024 (JAJ)",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "neutral_citation",
                "canonical_value": "[2025] CIGC (FSD) 81",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "judgment_date",
                "canonical_value": "2025-08-14",
                "extracted_value": "2025-04-30"
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "court",
                "canonical_value": "CIGC (FSD)",
                "extracted_value": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
            }
        ],
        "docai_processor_id": null
    },
    "akomaNtoso": {
        "doc": null,
        "judgment": {
            "meta": {
                "notes": {
                    "note": [
                        {
                            "eId": "note_1",
                            "text": "The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of contractual language regarding the authority to amend the management of a limited company. The key facts are that two parties, representing different factions within the company, disagreed on whether certain provisions in the contract between the shareholders and the corporation were correctly interpreted."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_2",
                            "text": "The dispute arose because one side argued that a particular clause interpreting the scope of decision-making authority was correctly interpreted one way, while the other side claimed it should be interpreted differently. The core issue was whether the correct interpretation required recognizing an alternative reading of certain contractual provisions."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_3",
                            "text": "In resolving this dispute, the court had to determine whether the correct interpretation would require applying an alternate interpretation rather than the original interpretation. This involved assessing how a court might interpret ambiguous language in a contract and whether a different interpretation could be justified based on standard legal principles."
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "workflow": {
                    "step": [
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_delivery",
                            "date": "2025-04-30",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
                        },
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_perfection",
                            "date": "2023-05-31",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_2"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "lifecycle": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "eventRef": [
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_delivery",
                            "date": "2025-04-30",
                            "type": "generation",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_perfection",
                            "date": "2023-05-31",
                            "type": "amendment",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "references": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "TLCRole": [],
                    "TLCEvent": [],
                    "TLCPerson": [],
                    "TLCConcept": [
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
                            "showAs": "Judgment delivered"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection",
                            "showAs": "Judgment perfected"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCProcess": [],
                    "TLCLocation": [],
                    "TLCOrganization": [
                        {
                            "eId": "org-court_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands",
                            "showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "classification": null,
                "identification": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "FRBRWork": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2025-04-30",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/!main",
                        "FRBRalias": [],
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#author",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRnumber": null,
                        "FRBRcountry": "ky",
                        "FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
                    },
                    "FRBRExpression": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2025-04-30",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@/!main",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRlanguage": "eng"
                    },
                    "FRBRManifestation": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2026-05-25",
                                "name": "extraction"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2025-04-30/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
                    }
                }
            },
            "name": "judgment",
            "header": {
                "court": {
                    "showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands",
                    "refersTo": "#org-court_1"
                },
                "judges": [],
                "lawyers": [],
                "parties": [],
                "docketNumber": null,
                "judgmentKind": "Ordinary",
                "neutralCitation": null
            }
        }
    }
}