6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
AI extraction · jid 2820 · granite4:3b-h · 2026-05-25T09:48:22Z

Dwayne Robin Thompson v The King - Judgment

Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
4 validation flags Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
Field AI extracted Canonical (CSV)
cause_number empty FSD 0335/2024 (JAJ)
neutral_citation empty [2025] CIGC (FSD) 58
judgment_date 2023-06-01 2025-06-24
court Supreme Court CIGC (FSD)

Core metadata

FieldValue
Neutral citation [2026] CICA (Crim) 3
Cause number CICA (CRIM) APPEAL NO. 0013 OF 2024
Court Court of Appeal
Court token (AKN) cigc-other
Judgment date 2026-Feb-17
Judge(s) Asif J
Parties Jie Irene Shen v Inspire Inc and Xiaohu Tiger Qie - Judgment (No. 3)
Subject Application of R v Gorman and jurynote procedure; communication between judge and jury; whether judges handling of ambiguous jury note amounted to material irregularity; propriety of addressing jury in open court before Consulting counsel; judicial discretion not to press jurors for particulars following their second note; adequacy of judicial directions reinforcing impartiality, absence of external influence, and duty to report concerns; whether failure to inquire further created a lurking doubt affecting the safety of verdicts; assessment of whether any handling of jury notes jeopardised fairness; affirmation that convictions for robbery, possession of unlicensed firearm, and possession of ammunition were safe
Classification text_layer
Extraction method pymupdf

Akoma Ntoso identifiers

Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown
Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@
Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@.pdf

Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced

Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.

Persons (2)

  • John Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe
  • Jane Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.jane-doe

Organisations (1)

  • Supreme Court
    /akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.supreme-court

Concepts (2)

  • Judgment delivered
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery
  • Judgment perfected
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection

Roles (2)

  • Plaintiff
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/plaintiff
  • Defendant
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/defendant

Lifecycle events

eIdDateTypeSource
ev_delivery 2023-06-01 generation #canary
ev_perfection 2023-06-15 amendment #canary

Extraction provenance

Model
granite4:3b-h
Pipeline version
0.2.0-akn
Extracted at
2026-05-25T09:48:22Z
Text method
pymupdf
Input tokens
4,096
Output tokens
187
Word count
6,888
Paragraph count
2025
PDF pages
16
PDF MD5
adf0edf4d8ac7965bc27e87ba5434e26
PDF filename
25-06-24-Shen-v-Inspire-Inc-No-3-Judgment.pdf
Run ID
3460
Run ok?
yes
Run duration (s)
28.0
Quality score
0.765
Re-run priority
medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
    "_canary": {
        "iri": {
            "work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown",
            "expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@",
            "manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@.pdf"
        },
        "pdf": {
            "md5": "adf0edf4d8ac7965bc27e87ba5434e26",
            "path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/25-06-24-Shen-v-Inspire-Inc-No-3-Judgment.pdf",
            "pages": 16,
            "filename": "25-06-24-Shen-v-Inspire-Inc-No-3-Judgment.pdf"
        },
        "errors": [],
        "extraction": {
            "model": "granite4:3b-h",
            "stats": {
                "word_count": 6888,
                "paragraph_count": 2025,
                "text_char_count": 39015
            },
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 4096,
                "output_tokens": 187,
                "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
                "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
            },
            "method": "pymupdf",
            "version": "0.2.0-akn",
            "extracted_at": "2026-05-25T09:48:22.942161+00:00"
        },
        "classification": "text_layer",
        "validation_flags": [
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "cause_number",
                "canonical_value": "FSD 0335/2024 (JAJ)",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "neutral_citation",
                "canonical_value": "[2025] CIGC (FSD) 58",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "judgment_date",
                "canonical_value": "2025-06-24",
                "extracted_value": "2023-06-01"
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "court",
                "canonical_value": "CIGC (FSD)",
                "extracted_value": "Supreme Court"
            }
        ],
        "docai_processor_id": null
    },
    "akomaNtoso": {
        "doc": null,
        "judgment": {
            "meta": {
                "notes": {
                    "note": [
                        {
                            "eId": "note_1",
                            "text": "The court found that the defendant's argument for not applying the rule was not convincing."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_2",
                            "text": "The court acknowledged the potential issue of the defendant potentially being in breach of contract but ruled against it."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_3",
                            "text": "The decision highlights the importance of considering whether a party has met the threshold for an action to be taken, even if there are arguments against it."
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "workflow": {
                    "step": [
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-06-01",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
                        },
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_perfection",
                            "date": "2023-06-15",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_2"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "lifecycle": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "eventRef": [
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-06-01",
                            "type": "generation",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_perfection",
                            "date": "2023-06-15",
                            "type": "amendment",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "references": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "TLCRole": [
                        {
                            "eId": "role_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/plaintiff",
                            "showAs": "Plaintiff"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "role_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/defendant",
                            "showAs": "Defendant"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCEvent": [],
                    "TLCPerson": [
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe",
                            "showAs": "John Doe"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.jane-doe",
                            "showAs": "Jane Doe"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCConcept": [
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
                            "showAs": "Judgment delivered"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection",
                            "showAs": "Judgment perfected"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCProcess": [],
                    "TLCLocation": [],
                    "TLCOrganization": [
                        {
                            "eId": "org-court_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.supreme-court",
                            "showAs": "Supreme Court"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "classification": null,
                "identification": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "FRBRWork": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-06-01",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/!main",
                        "FRBRalias": [],
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#author",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.supreme-court"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRnumber": null,
                        "FRBRcountry": "ky",
                        "FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
                    },
                    "FRBRExpression": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-06-01",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@/!main",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRlanguage": "eng"
                    },
                    "FRBRManifestation": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2026-05-25",
                                "name": "extraction"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-01/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
                    }
                }
            },
            "name": "judgment",
            "header": {
                "court": {
                    "showAs": "Supreme Court",
                    "refersTo": "#org-court_1"
                },
                "judges": [],
                "lawyers": [],
                "parties": [
                    {
                        "as": "#role_1",
                        "eId": "party_1",
                        "name": "John Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
                        "sequence": 1
                    },
                    {
                        "as": "#role_2",
                        "eId": "party_2",
                        "name": "Jane Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_2",
                        "sequence": 1
                    }
                ],
                "docketNumber": null,
                "judgmentKind": "Interlocutory Order",
                "neutralCitation": null
            }
        }
    }
}
← Back to judgment Full audit trail