6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
AI extraction · jid 3049 · granite4:3b-h · 2026-05-25T07:37:43Z

Judgment

Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
Field AI extracted Canonical (CSV)
cause_number empty G 0050/2024
judgment_date 2023-06-15 2024-10-04
court Grand Court of the Cayman Islands CIGC (Civ)

Core metadata

FieldValue
Cause number G 0050/2024
Court CIGC (Civ)
Court token (AKN) cigc-other
Judgment date 2024-10-04
Judge(s) Asif J
Parties Edgewater Development Ltd v Nyami Nyami Ltd - Judgment
Subject Contracts; implied terms; whether to imply term that parties obliged to cooperate to appoint adjudicator; whether claim to adjudicator is time barred. Arbitration Act 2012, section 9; whether claim before Grand Court commenced in breach of Arbitration Act.
Classification text_layer
Extraction method pymupdf

Akoma Ntoso identifiers

Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown
Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@
Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@.pdf

Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced

Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.

Persons (2)

  • John Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe
  • Jane Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.jane-doe

Organisations (1)

  • Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
    /akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands

Concepts (1)

  • Judgment delivered
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery

Roles (1)

  • Client
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/client

Lifecycle events

eIdDateTypeSource
ev_delivery 2023-06-15 generation #canary

Extraction provenance

Model
granite4:3b-h
Pipeline version
0.2.0-akn
Extracted at
2026-05-25T07:37:43Z
Text method
pymupdf
Input tokens
4,096
Output tokens
230
Word count
9,549
Paragraph count
234
PDF pages
20
PDF MD5
3377f64e01a776c2c778ac347481fe23
PDF filename
24-10-04-Edgewater-Development-v-Nyami-Nyami-Ltd-Judgment.pdf
Run ID
3014
Run ok?
yes
Run duration (s)
30.8
Quality score
0.804
Re-run priority
medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
    "_canary": {
        "iri": {
            "work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown",
            "expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@",
            "manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@.pdf"
        },
        "pdf": {
            "md5": "3377f64e01a776c2c778ac347481fe23",
            "path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/24-10-04-Edgewater-Development-v-Nyami-Nyami-Ltd-Judgment.pdf",
            "pages": 20,
            "filename": "24-10-04-Edgewater-Development-v-Nyami-Nyami-Ltd-Judgment.pdf"
        },
        "errors": [],
        "extraction": {
            "model": "granite4:3b-h",
            "stats": {
                "word_count": 9549,
                "paragraph_count": 234,
                "text_char_count": 55088
            },
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 4096,
                "output_tokens": 230,
                "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
                "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
            },
            "method": "pymupdf",
            "version": "0.2.0-akn",
            "extracted_at": "2026-05-25T07:37:43.802467+00:00"
        },
        "classification": "text_layer",
        "validation_flags": [
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "cause_number",
                "canonical_value": "G 0050/2024",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "judgment_date",
                "canonical_value": "2024-10-04",
                "extracted_value": "2023-06-15"
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "court",
                "canonical_value": "CIGC (Civ)",
                "extracted_value": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
            }
        ],
        "docai_processor_id": null
    },
    "akomaNtoso": {
        "doc": null,
        "judgment": {
            "meta": {
                "notes": {
                    "note": [
                        {
                            "eId": "note_1",
                            "text": "1. The court found that the parties failed to establish a clear legal precedent for when an invitation is sufficient to trigger contractual obligations."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_2",
                            "text": "2. The court examined the specific arguments put forward by both sides, weighing the legal principles of intention and conduct in contract formation."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_3",
                            "text": "3. The judge concluded that while the concept of 'intention' can be complex, the principle of foreseeability guided the analysis, ultimately concluding that no clear breach of contractual intent occurred."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_4",
                            "text": "4. The court acknowledged the importance of considering both parties' perspectives but found insufficient evidence to support a definitive conclusion on whether the specific intention was met."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_5",
                            "text": "5. In summary, the case highlighted the complexities in determining when an invitation to contract becomes binding and emphasized the need for clarity in contractual language or intent."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_6",
                            "text": "8. "
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "workflow": {
                    "step": [
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-06-15",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "lifecycle": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "eventRef": [
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-06-15",
                            "type": "generation",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "references": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "TLCRole": [
                        {
                            "eId": "role_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/client",
                            "showAs": "Client"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCEvent": [],
                    "TLCPerson": [
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe",
                            "showAs": "John Doe"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.jane-doe",
                            "showAs": "Jane Doe"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCConcept": [
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
                            "showAs": "Judgment delivered"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCProcess": [],
                    "TLCLocation": [],
                    "TLCOrganization": [
                        {
                            "eId": "org-court_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands",
                            "showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "classification": null,
                "identification": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "FRBRWork": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-06-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/!main",
                        "FRBRalias": [],
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#author",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRnumber": null,
                        "FRBRcountry": "ky",
                        "FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
                    },
                    "FRBRExpression": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-06-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@/!main",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRlanguage": "eng"
                    },
                    "FRBRManifestation": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2026-05-25",
                                "name": "extraction"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-06-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
                    }
                }
            },
            "name": "judgment",
            "header": {
                "court": {
                    "showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands",
                    "refersTo": "#org-court_1"
                },
                "judges": [],
                "lawyers": [],
                "parties": [
                    {
                        "as": "#role_1",
                        "eId": "party_1",
                        "name": "John Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
                        "sequence": 1
                    },
                    {
                        "as": "#role_1",
                        "eId": "party_2",
                        "name": "Jane Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_2",
                        "sequence": 1
                    }
                ],
                "docketNumber": null,
                "judgmentKind": "Resolution",
                "neutralCitation": null
            }
        }
    }
}
← Back to judgment Full audit trail