AI extraction · jid 3089 · granite4:3b-h
· 2026-05-25T09:22:06Z
Judgment
Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags
Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
| Field | AI extracted | Canonical (CSV) |
|---|---|---|
cause_number |
empty | FAM 0069/2022 |
judgment_date |
2023-09-15 | 2024-08-09 |
court |
Court Order | CIGC (Fam) |
Core metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cause number | FAM 0069/2022 |
| Court | CIGC (Fam) |
| Court token (AKN) | cigc-other |
| Judgment date | 2024-08-09 |
| Judge(s) | Williams J |
| Parties | JW v SC - Judgment - Costs and Costs of Fact Finding |
| Subject | Children Act proceedings – Appeal from Summary Court – Costs application in relation to a fact-finding hearing in the Family Division - Costs allowance/contribution application relating to Grand Court proceedings withdrawn after the conclusion of the hearing. |
| Classification | text_layer |
| Extraction method | pymupdf |
Akoma Ntoso identifiers
- Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown- Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@- Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf
Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced
Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.
Persons (1)
-
John Doe
/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe
Organisations (1)
-
Court Order
/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order
Concepts (1)
-
Judgment delivered
/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery
Roles (1)
-
Respondent
/akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent
Lifecycle events
| eId | Date | Type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
ev_delivery |
2023-09-15 | generation | #canary |
Extraction provenance
- Model
- granite4:3b-h
- Pipeline version
- 0.2.0-akn
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-25T09:22:06Z
- Text method
- pymupdf
- Input tokens
- 4,096
- Output tokens
- 330
- Word count
- 35,828
- Paragraph count
- 2024
- PDF pages
- 43
- PDF MD5
- 4cf1bdab1df8a792ab30c00960492f19
- PDF filename
- 24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf
- Run ID
- 3371
- Run ok?
- yes
- Run duration (s)
- 38.5
- Quality score
- 0.804
- Re-run priority
- medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
"_canary": {
"iri": {
"work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown",
"expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@",
"manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf"
},
"pdf": {
"md5": "4cf1bdab1df8a792ab30c00960492f19",
"path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf",
"pages": 43,
"filename": "24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf"
},
"errors": [],
"extraction": {
"model": "granite4:3b-h",
"stats": {
"word_count": 35828,
"paragraph_count": 2024,
"text_char_count": 179279
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 4096,
"output_tokens": 330,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
},
"method": "pymupdf",
"version": "0.2.0-akn",
"extracted_at": "2026-05-25T09:22:06.792789+00:00"
},
"classification": "text_layer",
"validation_flags": [
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "cause_number",
"canonical_value": "FAM 0069/2022",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": "2024-08-09",
"extracted_value": "2023-09-15"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "court",
"canonical_value": "CIGC (Fam)",
"extracted_value": "Court Order"
}
],
"docai_processor_id": null
},
"akomaNtoso": {
"doc": null,
"judgment": {
"meta": {
"notes": {
"note": [
{
"eId": "note_1",
"text": "Explain why the case was not decided in favor of the applicant:"
},
{
"eId": "note_2",
"text": "The court found that while the application raised some valid concerns about the procedural fairness and potential bias in the original decision, it ultimately found that there were no substantial grounds for overturning the initial decision. The main reasons included:\n\n1. **The Court acknowledged the procedural errors identified by the applicant, such as the lack of proper notice and opportunity to respond within a reasonable timeframe."
},
{
"eId": "note_3",
"text": "However, the court determined that these procedural deficiencies did not fundamentally undermine the validity of the original decision. The key factors were:"
},
{
"eId": "note_4",
"text": "\n1. **Procedural fairness concerns:** While there was an acknowledgment that the procedural steps were inadequate, the court found that the overall process adhered to legal principles and ensured a fair outcome."
},
{
"eId": "note_5",
"text": "2. **Procedural fairness considerations:** The court acknowledged that while there were procedural deficiencies, they did not fundamentally undermine the integrity of the decision-making process. The court acknowledged that the procedural deficiencies did not significantly impact the final outcome."
},
{
"eId": "note_6",
"text": "3. **Procedural fairness considerations:** The court acknowledged that while there were procedural deficiencies, these did not substantially affect the overall fairness of the proceedings and did not warrant overturning the initial decision."
},
{
"eId": "note_7",
"text": "2023-09-15"
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"workflow": {
"step": [
{
"as": null,
"by": "#canary",
"eId": "step_delivery",
"date": "2023-09-15",
"outcome": null,
"refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"lifecycle": {
"source": "#canary",
"eventRef": [
{
"eId": "ev_delivery",
"date": "2023-09-15",
"type": "generation",
"source": "#canary"
}
]
},
"references": {
"source": "#canary",
"TLCRole": [
{
"eId": "role_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent",
"showAs": "Respondent"
}
],
"TLCEvent": [],
"TLCPerson": [
{
"eId": "person-party-natural_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe",
"showAs": "John Doe"
}
],
"TLCConcept": [
{
"eId": "concept-step_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
"showAs": "Judgment delivered"
}
],
"TLCProcess": [],
"TLCLocation": [],
"TLCOrganization": [
{
"eId": "org-court_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order",
"showAs": "Court Order"
}
]
},
"classification": null,
"identification": {
"source": "#canary",
"FRBRWork": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2023-09-15",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/!main",
"FRBRalias": [],
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#author",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order"
}
],
"FRBRnumber": null,
"FRBRcountry": "ky",
"FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
},
"FRBRExpression": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2023-09-15",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@/!main",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRlanguage": "eng"
},
"FRBRManifestation": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "extraction"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
}
}
},
"name": "judgment",
"header": {
"court": {
"showAs": "Court Order",
"refersTo": "#org-court_1"
},
"judges": [],
"lawyers": [],
"parties": [
{
"as": "#role_1",
"eId": "party_1",
"name": "John Doe",
"refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
"sequence": 1
}
],
"docketNumber": null,
"judgmentKind": null,
"neutralCitation": null
}
}
}
}