6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
AI extraction · jid 3089 · granite4:3b-h · 2026-05-25T09:22:06Z

Judgment

Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
Field AI extracted Canonical (CSV)
cause_number empty FAM 0069/2022
judgment_date 2023-09-15 2024-08-09
court Court Order CIGC (Fam)

Core metadata

FieldValue
Cause number FAM 0069/2022
Court CIGC (Fam)
Court token (AKN) cigc-other
Judgment date 2024-08-09
Judge(s) Williams J
Parties JW v SC - Judgment - Costs and Costs of Fact Finding
Subject Children Act proceedings – Appeal from Summary Court – Costs application in relation to a fact-finding hearing in the Family Division - Costs allowance/contribution application relating to Grand Court proceedings withdrawn after the conclusion of the hearing.
Classification text_layer
Extraction method pymupdf

Akoma Ntoso identifiers

Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown
Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@
Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf

Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced

Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.

Persons (1)

  • John Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe

Organisations (1)

  • Court Order
    /akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order

Concepts (1)

  • Judgment delivered
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery

Roles (1)

  • Respondent
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent

Lifecycle events

eIdDateTypeSource
ev_delivery 2023-09-15 generation #canary

Extraction provenance

Model
granite4:3b-h
Pipeline version
0.2.0-akn
Extracted at
2026-05-25T09:22:06Z
Text method
pymupdf
Input tokens
4,096
Output tokens
330
Word count
35,828
Paragraph count
2024
PDF pages
43
PDF MD5
4cf1bdab1df8a792ab30c00960492f19
PDF filename
24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf
Run ID
3371
Run ok?
yes
Run duration (s)
38.5
Quality score
0.804
Re-run priority
medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
    "_canary": {
        "iri": {
            "work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown",
            "expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@",
            "manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf"
        },
        "pdf": {
            "md5": "4cf1bdab1df8a792ab30c00960492f19",
            "path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf",
            "pages": 43,
            "filename": "24-08-09_jw_v_sc_-_judgment_-_costs_and_costs_of_fact_finding.pdf"
        },
        "errors": [],
        "extraction": {
            "model": "granite4:3b-h",
            "stats": {
                "word_count": 35828,
                "paragraph_count": 2024,
                "text_char_count": 179279
            },
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 4096,
                "output_tokens": 330,
                "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
                "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
            },
            "method": "pymupdf",
            "version": "0.2.0-akn",
            "extracted_at": "2026-05-25T09:22:06.792789+00:00"
        },
        "classification": "text_layer",
        "validation_flags": [
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "cause_number",
                "canonical_value": "FAM 0069/2022",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "judgment_date",
                "canonical_value": "2024-08-09",
                "extracted_value": "2023-09-15"
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "court",
                "canonical_value": "CIGC (Fam)",
                "extracted_value": "Court Order"
            }
        ],
        "docai_processor_id": null
    },
    "akomaNtoso": {
        "doc": null,
        "judgment": {
            "meta": {
                "notes": {
                    "note": [
                        {
                            "eId": "note_1",
                            "text": "Explain why the case was not decided in favor of the applicant:"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_2",
                            "text": "The court found that while the application raised some valid concerns about the procedural fairness and potential bias in the original decision, it ultimately found that there were no substantial grounds for overturning the initial decision. The main reasons included:\n\n1. **The Court acknowledged the procedural errors identified by the applicant, such as the lack of proper notice and opportunity to respond within a reasonable timeframe."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_3",
                            "text": "However, the court determined that these procedural deficiencies did not fundamentally undermine the validity of the original decision. The key factors were:"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_4",
                            "text": "\n1. **Procedural fairness concerns:** While there was an acknowledgment that the procedural steps were inadequate, the court found that the overall process adhered to legal principles and ensured a fair outcome."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_5",
                            "text": "2. **Procedural fairness considerations:** The court acknowledged that while there were procedural deficiencies, they did not fundamentally undermine the integrity of the decision-making process. The court acknowledged that the procedural deficiencies did not significantly impact the final outcome."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_6",
                            "text": "3. **Procedural fairness considerations:** The court acknowledged that while there were procedural deficiencies, these did not substantially affect the overall fairness of the proceedings and did not warrant overturning the initial decision."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_7",
                            "text": "2023-09-15"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "workflow": {
                    "step": [
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-09-15",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "lifecycle": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "eventRef": [
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-09-15",
                            "type": "generation",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "references": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "TLCRole": [
                        {
                            "eId": "role_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent",
                            "showAs": "Respondent"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCEvent": [],
                    "TLCPerson": [
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe",
                            "showAs": "John Doe"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCConcept": [
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
                            "showAs": "Judgment delivered"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCProcess": [],
                    "TLCLocation": [],
                    "TLCOrganization": [
                        {
                            "eId": "org-court_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order",
                            "showAs": "Court Order"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "classification": null,
                "identification": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "FRBRWork": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-09-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/!main",
                        "FRBRalias": [],
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#author",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-order"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRnumber": null,
                        "FRBRcountry": "ky",
                        "FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
                    },
                    "FRBRExpression": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-09-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@/!main",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRlanguage": "eng"
                    },
                    "FRBRManifestation": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2026-05-25",
                                "name": "extraction"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
                    }
                }
            },
            "name": "judgment",
            "header": {
                "court": {
                    "showAs": "Court Order",
                    "refersTo": "#org-court_1"
                },
                "judges": [],
                "lawyers": [],
                "parties": [
                    {
                        "as": "#role_1",
                        "eId": "party_1",
                        "name": "John Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
                        "sequence": 1
                    }
                ],
                "docketNumber": null,
                "judgmentKind": null,
                "neutralCitation": null
            }
        }
    }
}
← Back to judgment Full audit trail