AI extraction · jid 3299 · granite4:3b-h
· 2026-05-25T08:04:07Z
Judgment
Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags
Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
| Field | AI extracted | Canonical (CSV) |
|---|---|---|
cause_number |
empty | FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ) |
judgment_date |
2023-09-25 | 2023-10-10 |
court |
Crown Court | CIGC (FSD) |
Core metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cause number | FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Court token (AKN) | cigc-other |
| Judgment date | 2023-10-10 |
| Judge(s) | Kawaley J |
| Parties | Fortunate Drift Limited v Canterbury Securities Ltd - Ruling on Leave to Appeal and Stay |
| Subject | Leave to appeal-stay pending appeal-extension of time for seeking leave to appeal-jurisdiction of Grand Court-Court of Appeal Act (2023 Revision) sections 31 (1) (a), 33-Rules of the Court of Appeal Rules (2014 Revision) Order 21 rule 4. Civil Procedure; Appeals; Injunctions |
| Classification | text_layer |
| Extraction method | pymupdf |
Akoma Ntoso identifiers
- Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown- Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@- Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@.pdf
Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced
Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.
Organisations (1)
-
Crown Court
/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.crown-court
Concepts (2)
-
Hearing
/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/hearing -
Judgment delivered
/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery
Lifecycle events
| eId | Date | Type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
ev_delivery |
2023-09-25 | generation | #canary |
Extraction provenance
- Model
- granite4:3b-h
- Pipeline version
- 0.2.0-akn
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-25T08:04:07Z
- Text method
- pymupdf
- Input tokens
- 4,096
- Output tokens
- 180
- Word count
- 6,167
- Paragraph count
- 33
- PDF pages
- 13
- PDF MD5
- c121a309925f3cf55edefd3981fd64d9
- PDF filename
- 23-10-10-Fortunate-Drift-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd-FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Ruling-on-Leave-to-Appeal-and-Stay.pdf
- Run ID
- 3110
- Run ok?
- yes
- Run duration (s)
- 27.7
- Quality score
- 0.804
- Re-run priority
- medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
"_canary": {
"iri": {
"work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown",
"expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@",
"manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@.pdf"
},
"pdf": {
"md5": "c121a309925f3cf55edefd3981fd64d9",
"path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/23-10-10-Fortunate-Drift-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd-FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Ruling-on-Leave-to-Appeal-and-Stay.pdf",
"pages": 13,
"filename": "23-10-10-Fortunate-Drift-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd-FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Ruling-on-Leave-to-Appeal-and-Stay.pdf"
},
"errors": [],
"extraction": {
"model": "granite4:3b-h",
"stats": {
"word_count": 6167,
"paragraph_count": 33,
"text_char_count": 33479
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 4096,
"output_tokens": 180,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
},
"method": "pymupdf",
"version": "0.2.0-akn",
"extracted_at": "2026-05-25T08:04:07.512395+00:00"
},
"classification": "text_layer",
"validation_flags": [
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "cause_number",
"canonical_value": "FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ)",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": "2023-10-10",
"extracted_value": "2023-09-25"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "court",
"canonical_value": "CIGC (FSD)",
"extracted_value": "Crown Court"
}
],
"docai_processor_id": null
},
"akomaNtoso": {
"doc": null,
"judgment": {
"meta": {
"notes": {
"note": [
{
"eId": "note_1",
"text": "The case concerns a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection regarding the application of the Mental Capacity Act 2001. The key issues include: (1) whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine the validity of an order issued by the Court of Protection; (2) the scope and limits of the powers conferred on the Court under the Mental Capacity Act 2001, including the extent to which it can override decisions made by the Court of Protection; and (2) the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2001 and associated regulations."
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"workflow": {
"step": [
{
"as": null,
"by": "#canary",
"eId": "step_hearing_1",
"date": "2023-10-05",
"outcome": null,
"refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
},
{
"as": null,
"by": "#canary",
"eId": "step_delivery",
"date": "2023-09-25",
"outcome": null,
"refersTo": "#concept-step_2"
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"lifecycle": {
"source": "#canary",
"eventRef": [
{
"eId": "ev_delivery",
"date": "2023-09-25",
"type": "generation",
"source": "#canary"
}
]
},
"references": {
"source": "#canary",
"TLCRole": [],
"TLCEvent": [],
"TLCPerson": [],
"TLCConcept": [
{
"eId": "concept-step_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/hearing",
"showAs": "Hearing"
},
{
"eId": "concept-step_2",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
"showAs": "Judgment delivered"
}
],
"TLCProcess": [],
"TLCLocation": [],
"TLCOrganization": [
{
"eId": "org-court_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.crown-court",
"showAs": "Crown Court"
}
]
},
"classification": null,
"identification": {
"source": "#canary",
"FRBRWork": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2023-09-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/!main",
"FRBRalias": [],
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#author",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.crown-court"
}
],
"FRBRnumber": null,
"FRBRcountry": "ky",
"FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
},
"FRBRExpression": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2023-09-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@/!main",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRlanguage": "eng"
},
"FRBRManifestation": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "extraction"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-09-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
}
}
},
"name": "judgment",
"header": {
"court": {
"showAs": "Crown Court",
"refersTo": "#org-court_1"
},
"judges": [],
"lawyers": [],
"parties": [],
"docketNumber": null,
"judgmentKind": "Decision",
"neutralCitation": null
}
}
}
}