AI extraction · jid 3359 · granite4:3b-h
· 2026-05-25T12:05:22Z
Judgment
Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags
Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
| Field | AI extracted | Canonical (CSV) |
|---|---|---|
cause_number |
empty | FSD 0269/2022 (NSJ) |
judgment_date |
empty | 2023-07-20 |
court |
Grand Court of the Cayman Islands | CIGC (FSD) |
Core metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cause number | FSD 0269/2022 (NSJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Court token (AKN) | cigc-other |
| Judgment date | 2023-07-20 |
| Judge(s) | Segal J |
| Parties | IGCF SPV 21 Ltd v Al Jomaih Power Ltd and Denham Investment Ltd - Judgment |
| Subject | Exclusive jurisdiction clause in a shareholders agreement governed by English law with respect to a Cayman company (A) stipulating that disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement be litigated in Cayman or London – X, Y and Z own the shares in A - A owns a majority stake in a company incorporated in Pakistan (B) – B is a regulated utility company in Pakistan and the other shares in B are owned by the Government of Pakistan – the shareholders of B are subject to the terms of a sale and purchase agreement governed by Pakistan law - the sole voting share in X and interests in other shareholders of X were transferred and X sought to exercise its rights under the shareholders agreement to require A to appoint new directors to the board of B – Y and Z opposed such an appointment and commenced proceedings in Pakistan against X, A and B and the Government of Pakistan and the Pakistan regulatory authorities seeking orders against X and the Pakistan authorities – Y and Z also obtained an interim injunction against X – X claimed that the commencement of the proceedings in Pakistan were in breach of the exclusive jurisdiction clause and applied for a permanent injunction restraining X and Y from continuing with those proceedings. Anti‑Suit Injunctions; Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses; International Comity; Contract Interpretation; Conflict of Laws; Company & Shareholder Disputes; Foreign Proceedings |
| Classification | text_layer |
| Extraction method | pymupdf |
Akoma Ntoso identifiers
- Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown- Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@- Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf
Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced
Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.
Organisations (1)
-
Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands
Extraction provenance
- Model
- granite4:3b-h
- Pipeline version
- 0.2.0-akn
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-25T12:05:22Z
- Text method
- pymupdf
- Input tokens
- 4,096
- Output tokens
- 243
- Word count
- 162,411
- Paragraph count
- 229
- PDF pages
- 108
- PDF MD5
- e413a1f591828b3e51402d978ce07bee
- PDF filename
- 23-07-20-IGCF-SPV-21-v-Al-Jomaih-Power-Limited-and-Denham-Investment-Ltd-Judgment-FSD-269-of-2022-NSJ.pdf
- Run ID
- 4370
- Run ok?
- yes
- Run duration (s)
- 148.9
- Quality score
- 0.804
- Re-run priority
- medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
"_canary": {
"iri": {
"work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown",
"expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@",
"manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf"
},
"pdf": {
"md5": "e413a1f591828b3e51402d978ce07bee",
"path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/23-07-20-IGCF-SPV-21-v-Al-Jomaih-Power-Limited-and-Denham-Investment-Ltd-Judgment-FSD-269-of-2022-NSJ.pdf",
"pages": 108,
"filename": "23-07-20-IGCF-SPV-21-v-Al-Jomaih-Power-Limited-and-Denham-Investment-Ltd-Judgment-FSD-269-of-2022-NSJ.pdf"
},
"errors": [],
"extraction": {
"model": "granite4:3b-h",
"stats": {
"word_count": 162411,
"paragraph_count": 229,
"text_char_count": 792294
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 4096,
"output_tokens": 243,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
},
"method": "pymupdf",
"version": "0.2.0-akn",
"extracted_at": "2026-05-25T12:05:22.714848+00:00"
},
"classification": "text_layer",
"validation_flags": [
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "cause_number",
"canonical_value": "FSD 0269/2022 (NSJ)",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": "2023-07-20",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "court",
"canonical_value": "CIGC (FSD)",
"extracted_value": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
}
],
"docai_processor_id": null
},
"akomaNtoso": {
"doc": null,
"judgment": {
"meta": {
"notes": {
"note": [
{
"eId": "note_1",
"text": "The query does not specify whether the claimants are parties to a lawsuit or any other legal action. Therefore, there is no clear indication of whether the claimants are acting as parties (e.g., defendants) in a particular case or suit."
},
{
"eId": "note_2",
"text": "The context provided indicates that the claimants are seeking to determine whether they are 'parties' to certain litigation involving specific companies and transactions, but does not explicitly state their relationship as litigants or plaintiffs/defendants. Therefore, while they may be parties on some level (e.g., as defendants), this is not confirmed by any explicit reference to being sued or involved in a lawsuit."
},
{
"eId": "note_3",
"text": "The queries relate to alleged involvement of the claimants as parties to certain legal actions or transactions, but do not explicitly state their status as plaintiffs, defendants, or otherwise. Therefore, while they may be considered 'parties' on some level (e.g., as defendants), this does not constitute clear evidence that they are indeed litigants in a particular lawsuit or transaction."
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"workflow": null,
"lifecycle": {
"source": "#canary",
"eventRef": []
},
"references": {
"source": "#canary",
"TLCRole": [],
"TLCEvent": [],
"TLCPerson": [],
"TLCConcept": [],
"TLCProcess": [],
"TLCLocation": [],
"TLCOrganization": [
{
"eId": "org-court_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands",
"showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
}
]
},
"classification": null,
"identification": {
"source": "#canary",
"FRBRWork": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/!main",
"FRBRalias": [],
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#author",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands"
}
],
"FRBRnumber": null,
"FRBRcountry": "ky",
"FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
},
"FRBRExpression": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@/!main",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRlanguage": "eng"
},
"FRBRManifestation": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "extraction"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
}
}
},
"name": "judgment",
"header": {
"court": {
"showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands",
"refersTo": "#org-court_1"
},
"judges": [],
"lawyers": [],
"parties": [],
"docketNumber": null,
"judgmentKind": "DECISION",
"neutralCitation": null
}
}
}
}