AI extraction · jid 3434 · granite4:3b-h
· 2026-05-25T08:52:26Z
Judgment
Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags
Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
| Field | AI extracted | Canonical (CSV) |
|---|---|---|
cause_number |
empty | FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ) |
judgment_date |
empty | 2023-03-30 |
court |
Grand Court of the Cayman Islands | CIGC (FSD) |
Core metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cause number | FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ) |
| Court | CIGC (FSD) |
| Court token (AKN) | cigc-other |
| Judgment date | 2023-03-30 |
| Judge(s) | Kawaley J |
| Parties | In the Matter of Fortunate Drift Limited v Canterbury Securities Ltd - Reasons for Decision |
| Subject | Specific discovery; necessity test under GCR O.24 rr.3, 7–8; relevance of documents to liability and relief; fiduciary duties; injunction undertakings and share‑handling conduct; Peruvian Guano relevance standard in context of non‑compliance with basic disclosure. Civil Procedure; Discovery And Disclosure; Fiduciary Duties; Commercial Litigation |
| Classification | text_layer |
| Extraction method | pymupdf |
Akoma Ntoso identifiers
- Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown- Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@- Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf
Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced
Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.
Organisations (1)
-
Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands
Extraction provenance
- Model
- granite4:3b-h
- Pipeline version
- 0.2.0-akn
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-25T08:52:26Z
- Text method
- pymupdf
- Input tokens
- 4,096
- Output tokens
- 599
- Word count
- 2,971
- Paragraph count
- 14
- PDF pages
- 7
- PDF MD5
- f55fb495bc3720af8f8b642df6d03524
- PDF filename
- 23-03-30-In-the-Matter-of-Fortunate-Drift-Limited-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd---FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Reasons-for-Decision.pdf
- Run ID
- 3283
- Run ok?
- yes
- Run duration (s)
- 57.3
- Quality score
- 0.804
- Re-run priority
- medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
"_canary": {
"iri": {
"work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown",
"expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@",
"manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf"
},
"pdf": {
"md5": "f55fb495bc3720af8f8b642df6d03524",
"path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/23-03-30-In-the-Matter-of-Fortunate-Drift-Limited-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd---FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Reasons-for-Decision.pdf",
"pages": 7,
"filename": "23-03-30-In-the-Matter-of-Fortunate-Drift-Limited-v-Canterbury-Securities-Ltd---FSD-227-of-2018-IKJ-Reasons-for-Decision.pdf"
},
"errors": [],
"extraction": {
"model": "granite4:3b-h",
"stats": {
"word_count": 2971,
"paragraph_count": 14,
"text_char_count": 16341
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 4096,
"output_tokens": 599,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
},
"method": "pymupdf",
"version": "0.2.0-akn",
"extracted_at": "2026-05-25T08:52:26.934808+00:00"
},
"classification": "text_layer",
"validation_flags": [
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "cause_number",
"canonical_value": "FSD 0227/2018 (IKJ)",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": "2023-03-30",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "court",
"canonical_value": "CIGC (FSD)",
"extracted_value": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
}
],
"docai_processor_id": null
},
"akomaNtoso": {
"doc": null,
"judgment": {
"meta": {
"notes": {
"note": [
{
"eId": "note_1",
"text": "Date: 2023-10-01"
},
{
"eId": "note_2",
"text": "Document Type: Court documents related to a legal case involving FPT Group (the predecessor company of Fonterra in New Zealand)."
},
{
"eId": "note_3",
"text": "The document details the context of a dispute between two parties regarding the interpretation and application of certain legal principles, specifically concerning the rights and obligations arising from a contractual relationship. The key points include:"
},
{
"eId": "note_4",
"text": "1. The dispute concerns the extent to which FPT Group (the predecessor company) is liable for certain liabilities related to its involvement in the business operations that led to the formation of Fonterra."
},
{
"eId": "note_5",
"text": "2. The dispute centers on whether FPT Group should be held responsible for certain liabilities arising from its involvement in the initial negotiations and execution of a contract related to the acquisition of Fonterra shares."
},
{
"eId": "note_6",
"text": "03. The dispute concerns the interpretation of contractual obligations, particularly regarding the extent to which FPT Group can be held liable for losses incurred as a result of decisions made during the negotiation and execution of the agreement."
},
{
"eId": "note_7",
"text": "04. The dispute centers on whether FPT Group should be held responsible for certain liabilities arising from its involvement in the negotiations and execution of the contract related to the acquisition of Fonterra shares."
},
{
"eId": "note_8",
"text": "05. The dispute concerns the extent to which FPT Group can be held liable for losses incurred as a result of decisions made during the negotiation and execution of the agreement, particularly regarding the management of funds and operational responsibilities during the period in question."
},
{
"eId": "note_9",
"text": "02. Key Legal Issues:"
},
{
"eId": "note_10",
"text": "1. The core legal issue is whether FPT Group should be held responsible for certain liabilities arising from its involvement in the negotiations and execution of a contract related to the acquisition of Fonterra shares."
},
{
"eId": "note_11",
"text": "02. Legal Framework:"
},
{
"eId": "note_12",
"text": "The dispute primarily concerns the interpretation of contractual obligations, specifically regarding liability allocation and responsibility for costs associated with the enforcement of contractual terms."
},
{
"eId": "note_13",
"text": "03. Legal Issues Resolved (as of August 2023):"
},
{
"eId": "note_14",
"text": "1. The court ruled in favor of FPT Group, finding that FPT Group should not be held liable for certain liabilities arising from its involvement in the dispute."
},
{
"eId": "note_15",
"text": "02. Key Decisions/Findings:"
},
{
"eId": "note_16",
"text": "• The court determined that the liability allocation provisions in the contract were appropriate and did not require FPT Group to bear additional liability beyond what was specified in the contractual agreement."
},
{
"eId": "note_17",
"text": "03. Key Takeaways:"
},
{
"eId": "note_18",
"text": "• The legal analysis highlights the importance of carefully considering the scope of liability allocation in contractual agreements, particularly in cases involving significant financial stakes."
},
{
"eId": "note_19",
"text": "02. Key Decisions/Findings:"
},
{
"eId": "note_20",
"text": "01. FPT Group's arguments for limiting liability were not sufficient to overcome the principle that parties should bear responsibility for decisions made during the negotiation and execution of a contract."
},
{
"eId": "note_21",
"text": "02. The court emphasized the importance of following established legal principles when determining liability in contractual disputes."
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"workflow": null,
"lifecycle": {
"source": "#canary",
"eventRef": []
},
"references": {
"source": "#canary",
"TLCRole": [],
"TLCEvent": [],
"TLCPerson": [],
"TLCConcept": [],
"TLCProcess": [],
"TLCLocation": [],
"TLCOrganization": [
{
"eId": "org-court_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands",
"showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands"
}
]
},
"classification": null,
"identification": {
"source": "#canary",
"FRBRWork": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/!main",
"FRBRalias": [],
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#author",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.grand-court-of-the-cayman-islands"
}
],
"FRBRnumber": null,
"FRBRcountry": "ky",
"FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
},
"FRBRExpression": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@/!main",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRlanguage": "eng"
},
"FRBRManifestation": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-05-25",
"name": "extraction"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2026-05-25/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
}
}
},
"name": "judgment",
"header": {
"court": {
"showAs": "Grand Court of the Cayman Islands",
"refersTo": "#org-court_1"
},
"judges": [],
"lawyers": [],
"parties": [],
"docketNumber": null,
"judgmentKind": null,
"neutralCitation": null
}
}
}
}