6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 3652 · pdb #2777

Kurt Scott v Caribbean Utilities Company Ltd - Ruling

[2022] CIGC (G) 2 · G 0002/2014 · 2022-02-28

Civil procedure - preliminary issue - application to appoint guardian ad litem - litigation capacity. Litigation capacity; Appointment of guardian ad litem under GCR O.80; Definition of “patient” under Mental Health Act (2022 Revision); Psychiatric evidence; Issue-specific capacity; Role of Solicitor General as next friend

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
22-02-28-Kurt-Scott-v-CUC.pdf
3.03 MB · md5 f8d59fe148ffe572119fd30634d7108c
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/22-02-28-Kurt-Scott-v-CUC.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
672V17QIIIIL1G52HG9BBC2440DB5A0AA8A7511BD1D2DAB0559A.pdf
2.85 MB · md5 39233e52a0eefb89ec4ffdb6c8fd79c5
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1702 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3652 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 26 May 2026 18:47 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #12179 · quality 0.77
Text extraction
olmocr · qwen2.5vl:7b
55,498 chars in 92623 ms
LLM extraction
local · granite4:32b-a9b-h
parsed first try · 20106 ms
Validation flags (4): cause_number neutral_citation judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text15 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
[2022] CIGC (G) 2
Cause No. G 0002/2014
Between
Kurt Scott
- v -
Caribbean Utilities Company Ltd - Ruling
Before
Carter J
Judgment delivered 2022-02-28

```html <table> <tr> <td>IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CIVIL DIVISION</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CAUSE NO. 2 OF 2014</td> </tr> <tr> <td>BETWEEN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>KURT SCOTT</td> <td>Plaintiff</td> </tr> <tr> <td>AND</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CARIBBEAN UTILITIES COMPANY LTD</td> <td>Defendant</td> </tr> </table> <h3>OPEN COURT</h3> <p>Before: Hon Mrs. Justice Marlene Carter (Actg.)</p> <p>Appearances: Mr Jonathan Jones QC instructed by Ms. Kim Grandage and Mr Rupert Wheeler of KSG Attorneys for the Plaintiff Mr Harry Steinburg QC instructed by Ms. Natasha Partos of Campbells for the Defendant</p> <p>Date of Hearing: 18 February 2022</p> <p>Date of Decision: 18 February 2022</p> <p>Written Ruling Perfected 28 February 2022</p> <h3>HEADNOTE</h3> <p>Civil procedure - preliminary issue - application to appoint guardian ad litem - litigation capacity</p> <h3>RULING ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE</h3> <ol> <li>By summons dated 17 February 2022, an application has been made for the court to determine as a preliminary issue, before trial, whether the Plaintiff is a patient within the meaning of section 2 of the Mental Health Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for the purposes of Order 80 r. 2.</li> <li>Order 80 r. 2 states:</li> </ol> <p>“Person under disability must sue, etc., by next friend or guardian ad litem (O.80, r.2)</p> <p>220228 Kurt Scott v CUC - G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final</p> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>(1) A person under disability may not bring, or make a claim in, any proceedings except by his next friend and may not defend, make a counterclaim or intervene in any proceedings, or appear in any proceedings under a judgment or order, notice of which has been served on him, except by his guardian ad litem.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>(2) Subject to the provisions of these Rules, anything in the ordinary conduct of any proceedings is required or authorised by a provision of these Rules to be done by a party to the proceedings shall or may, if the party is a person under disability, be done by his next friend or guardian ad litem.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>(3) A next friend or guardian ad litem of a person under disability must act by an attorney."</td> </tr> </table>

Order 80 r. 3 (4) provides: <blockquote> <p>"Where, after any proceedings have been begun, a party to the proceedings becomes a patient, an application must be made to the Court for the appointment of a person to be next friend or guardian ad litum as the case may be, of that party."</p> </blockquote>

The summons was supported by the 4th affidavit of Kim Grandage. Within her affidavit, Ms. Grandage set out the chronology which led to the instant application. She related that the psychiatrist instructed by the Plaintiff, Dr. Wayne Kampers, had previously provided reports in this matter relating to the Plaintiff in 2014, 2017 and 2019 in all of which he specifically considered that the Plaintiff had capacity. She related further that: <ol start="8"> <li>Following the instruction of my firm the Plaintiff made an application to obtain a medical report from an alternative psychiatrist on the basis he was dissatisfied with Dr Kampers change of mind in the Joint Statement with the Defendant's expert Professor Greenberg.</li> </ol> 9 Whilst the Plaintiff was not permitted at that time to obtain a report from a new psychiatrist, the Plaintiff was permitted to ask questions of Dr Kampers.

The questions were put to Dr Kampers and by way of email dated 14 December 2021, Dr Kampers confirmed that he had advised the Plaintiff's previous Attorneys in March 2020 that he was concerned about the Plaintiff's capacity. This was the first time we were aware of the concerns. <ol start="1"> <li>Dr Kampers formally to the Court.</li> </ol> <blockquote> <p>Within the questions, stat Dr his applicatio and joint answers to on v ed that the Kampers 2 Pl the Court</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>…displaying chronic trauma-inflicted personality changes of a paranoid nature and, there may even be delusional component to his thinking including grandiosity.</p> </blockquote> 220228 Kurt Scott v CUC-G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>13.</td> <td>Dr Kampers indicated that the Plaintiff is suffering a new serious psychiatric illness and thus he expressed concerns regarding the Plaintiffs capacity."</td> </tr> <tr> <td>5.</td> <td>On the 26 January 2022 this court ordered that an updated assessment should be undertaken of the Plaintiff by Dr. Kampers. Upon that assessment, in his report dated 16 February 2022, Dr. Kampers concluded:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>“He is a mental health patient under the provisions of the Cayman Islands Mental Health Act 2021.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In my professional opinion he lacks litigation specific capacity for the reasons outlined above.”</td> </tr> <tr> <td>6.</td> <td>Dr. Kampers reasons for his determination that the Plaintiff lacked litigation capacity were as follows:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>“It is my observation that there has been a marked increase in his levels of paranoia, irritability and agitation. I have previously mentioned that I had concerns that he may be displaying chronic trauma inflicted personality changes of a paranoid nature.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Whilst I have never previously opined that Mr. Scott is in any way psychotic, the nature and degree of his paranoia and the increasing conviction about his conspiratorial beliefs is of concern as they certainly do appear to be far more prominent than before.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In my opinion [they] are interfering with his ability to function on a day-to-day basis as a litigant. It is the change in Mr. Scotts present of mental health evident throughout this process. Mr. Scotts pacts have been a concern ne</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7.</td> <td>In an addendum report also dated 16 February 2022, Dr Kampers states as flows:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In assessing Mr. Scotts current Capacity to Litigate:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>220228 Kurt Scott v CUC-G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final</td> </tr> </table> ```
```markdown - Is the person in question capable of understanding the issues about which they will most likely have to make decisions in the course of the proceedings? In relation to this, the person in question does not have to be able to understand the issues on their own (most lay people would struggle with this), but they must be able to understand them once they have been explained to them by a legal advisor or an expert. o Mr. Scott has capacity - In relation to this, the person in question does not have to be able to understand the issues on their own (most laypeople would struggle with this), but they must be able to understand them once they have been explained to them by a legal advisor or an expert. o Mr. Scott has capacity - Does the person in question have a basic understanding of how litigation and court proceedings work? In other words, do they understand the legal issues involved and the circumstances that have given rise to the case? o Mr. Scott has capacity - Importantly, the person must be able to understand the entirety of the legal proceedings, not just the individual decisions within those proceedings. o My opinion is that his paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity in this area Mr. Scott has capacity under the general provisions of mental capacity, which allow for the fact that persons may have the capacity to make some decisions but not others - In order to have the capacity to litigate, a person must understand all of the decisions and processes involved in the court proceedings (again, assuming that these have been explained to them by an expert) o In my opinion Mr. Scott's paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity in this area - Relatedly, does the person possess the capacity to litigate in a complex case? o In my opinion Mr. Scott's paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity in this area and he lacks the capacity to art of a moreputeur as this is litigate as p complicated dis Does the p tand, at ral have to r co the proceedings? o In my opinion Mr. Scott's paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity in this area. - Can they weigh up the arguments for and against the litigation? ``` This document appears to be a legal ruling from the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, specifically addressing the capacity of Mr. Scott to litigate in a complex case. The ruling discusses the understanding required for litigation, the capacity to understand legal proceedings, and the impact of Mr. Scott's paranoid mental state on his ability to litigate.
```html <table> <tr> <td>o In my opinion Mr. Scott's paranoid mental state and beliefs will</td> </tr> <tr> <td>interfere with his capacity in this area.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>He is a mental health patient under the provisions of the Cayman Islands</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mental Health Act 2021.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In my professional opinion he lacks litigation specific capacity for the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>reasons outlined above."</td> </tr> </table>

Ms. Grandage also states that the court may consider appointing the Solicitor General as guardian ad litem if it finds that the Plaintiff is a patient within the meaning of the Act. At paragraphs 25-27 of the affidavit she sets out the reasons behind this aspect of the application. <p>Guardian ad litem</p>

At page 5 the exhibit in his initial report, Dr Kampers states: <p>...I had previously mentioned consideration to the role of a litigation friend, and I had mentioned his mother but given her recent presentation and the dynamics between her and her son I did not think that she would enable the litigation and be capable of acting in her sons best interests."</p>

In the time I have had conduct of this matter, I have not been aware of any other family members or friends of the Plaintiff being involved in the Plaintiff's life or the litigation and thus who could be suitable to be appointed guardian ad litem. I have asked the Plaintiff and his mother if there is anybody whom they believe would be suitable for the role but at the time of swearing this Affidavit, they have not responded to this query.

Order 80 rule 3 (7) indicates that if it appears to the Court that there is no fit and proper person who is willing and able to act as guardian ad litem it shall appoint the Solicitor General.

On the 16 February 2022, I wrote to the Solicitor General and put them on notice of the Application and that we would potentially be seeking for the Solicitor General to be appointed guardian ad litem. They have indicated they may be willing to assist, and we have asked they attend Court at the start of the Trial on the 18 February 2022.</td> </tr> </table> The Plaintiff has adopted a position in respect of the application that he lacks litigation capacity. The Defendant adopts a neutral position and does not accept the application. The Plaintiff objects to the application and dothation to this application.

Upon consideration of a party's capacity to litigate, a court will focus on the person's ability to understand, engage in or follow litigation proceedings. Such consideration is concerned, not only on a person's ability to conduct their own proceedings but also on the ability to conduct 220228 Kurt Scott v CUC - G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>proceedings through their attorney. On the instant application the court has considered the evidence of Dr. Kampers in detail, both his written reports and oral evidence. The court has also heard from the Plaintiff's mother and the Plaintiff has, through the court, raised issues surrounding Dr. Kampers' findings. The court has been in a position to observe the Plaintiff's demeanour during this time.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>11.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The Plaintiff sought to engage the court in a discussion concerning the court's previous rulings on applications by the Plaintiff for the instruction of a second psychiatrist. Although the court was informed by the Plaintiff's attorneys that he had received copies of the court's rulings, the Plaintiff repeatedly returned to this issue when the court sought to direct his mind to Dr. Kampers' evidence. The Plaintiff also referred to the fact that the Defendant had changed one of its experts during the course of these proceedings, a matter that had no bearing on the issue before the court. The Plaintiff referred to the reports of a psychologist who had treated him while he was in the United States. Although Dr. Kampers and the court confirmed that Dr. Kampers had himself interviewed the psychologist and had incorporated this interview within one of his initial reports to the court, the Plaintiff insisted that the court should be considering the psychologist's reports on this application. The Plaintiff appeared unable to fully appreciate that the instant application was in respect of his capacity to litigate and not that of managing his day-to-day affairs.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>12.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The court has considered the following authorities:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>· Martin Masterman-Lister v Brutton &amp; Co [2002] EWCA Civ 1889, (per Chadwick LJ)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>“62. The authorities to which I have referred provide ample support for the proposition that, at common law at least, the test of mental capacity is issue-specific: that, as Lord Justice Kennedy has pointed out, the test has to be applied in relation to the particular transaction (its nature and complexity) in respect of which the question whether a party has capacity falls to be decided. It is difficult to see why, in the absence of some statutory or regulatory provision which compels a contrary conclusion, the same approach should not be adopted in relation to the pursuit or defence of litigation.”</td> </tr> <tr> <td>· Fo[2006] All E</td> </tr> <tr> <td>lks v FaizeyR(D) 83</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ecessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court is to be more than merely a rubber stamp. That is necessary if the court
Hinduja v Hinduja and Others [2020 EWHC 1553 (Ch)] The court re-iterated that mental capacity is assumed unless the contrary is proved. The burden is on the applicant for an order to establish that a patient lacked capacity. “...I do not think that the Court of Appeal [in Masterman] was intending to lay down any rigid principle under which medical evidence is required unless the circumstances are exceptional. The question will always depend on what the circumstances are.” The court found that medical evidence was not required in that case. #### 13. The court must determine whether there is adequate evidence to support the application for an order appointing a litigation friend or guardian ad litem and where there is no evidence suggesting that the application is anything but a bona fide one, the court should make the order sought. I bear in mind that mental capacity is assumed unless the contrary is proved and that there is no requirement for medical evidence to be presented on an application relating to capacity. In the instant case the Plaintiff disputes the appropriateness of the application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. This court has adopted the approach in Masterman of considering the psychiatric evidence from Dr. Kampers in support of the application. Dr. Kampers is a highly qualified psychiatrist. #### 14. Dr Kampers holds a (MBChB), Doctor of Medicine from the University of Cape Town Medical School, South Africa. He is a Licentiate of the Medical Council of Canada since 1993 and a member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists since 1998. He has over 17 years experience in the NHS and Independent Sector as a Consultant Old Age Psychiatrist. Dr Kampers also has extensive medico-legal experience in both the Civil and Criminal Justice Systems and his reports have been successfully used in the following areas: Personal injury medico legal reports relating to PTSD and cPTSD, Battered Woman Syndrome, Road traffic or workplace accidents, Depression and anxiety, Work related stress, and Psychiatric injury due to medical negligence. He has also produced Psychiatric reports relating to mental capacity issues, Testamentary capacity, Dementia, Wills and Probate. In his exampers stateiliar with the Kingdomed that he issue of capa 15.vidence, Dr. Kl that he was city in the Un n, and confinad taken farmit Plaintiff’s capacity to litigate when he interviewed him in March 2020. --- 1 The 4th affidavit of Kim Grandage details that Dr. Kampers confirmed that he had advised the Plaintiff’s previous Attorneys in March 2020 that he was concerned about the Plaintiff’s capacity. 220228 Kurt Scott v CUC – G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final 7

Dr Kampers related his observations of the Plaintiff's paranoia and general mental state when he interviewed him by ZOOM on 10 February 2022. He explained that he had great difficulty in trying to establish and explain to the Plaintiff the reason why he needed to be interviewed because of the Plaintiff was very angry and mistrustful. Dr Kampers described that he became concerned about the Plaintiff's ability in terms of decision-making. He stated that the Plaintiff was paranoid about many things: he believed that there were conspiracies against him and that he was mistrustful of his previous legal team, the court process, the experts involved and Dr. Kampers himself. He described that the Plaintiff displayed a "mistrust of everybody and everything."

Dr. Kampers was clear that he had never considered the Plaintiff to be psychotic. He explained that if one were psychotic, he would expect to see reality distortion in every aspect of the subject's life, for example hallucinations, or the acting out on delusional ideas. However, in the Plaintiff's case Dr. Kampers expressed that he was in touch with reality but there was evidence of a strong paranoid system that the Plaintiff operates on that affects every aspect of his daily life.

Specifically, Dr. Kampers re-iterated that "it is only in respect of litigation he lacks capacity and not in respect of managing his life. [He has] Capacity in everyday life but capacity specific issue is where issue lies. He knows what to eat, clothes, normal day to day life, no issue of capacity in that respect."

He related his observations of the Plaintiff and the progressive nature of his paranoia. Dr. Kampers went further to state that the Plaintiff lacked the ability to think through a decision non-impulsively. He found that the Plaintiff did not display reasoned flexible thinking because his fixed or paranoid ideas about lawyers or experts, that they were against him or in a conspiracy, meant that it is difficult for him to incorporate counterbalancing. He stated that it was his opinion that the Plaintiff does not have the ability to demonstrate reasoned flexible thinking as his internally contradicting ideas in terms of his paranoia, affect his ability to give coherent terms of this reasoning in case.

effect of the mistrust, the Plaintiff on litigation that is of concern. I find that the application is a bona fide one. 220228 Kurt Scott v CUC – G 2 of 2014 - Ruling on Preliminary Issue - Final ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>21.</td> <td>Mindful of the foregoing, I find that there is sufficient evidence before me to conclude that the Plaintiff is a patient within section 2 of the Act being a person “who is suffering from or is suspected to be suffering from mental impairment”. I find that the Plaintiff’s paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity to litigate and to understand the entirety of the proceedings. I believe that his mental state and beliefs will interfere with his ability to litigate in what is a complex and complicated case or to properly weigh up the arguments for and against litigation. The Plaintiff’s paranoid mental state and belief will also interfere with his capacity to understand a vitiating factor or factors upon which he may have to rely in the course of the instant proceedings.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>22.</td> <td>Pursuant to Order 80 r. 2 (2), the Solicitor General or her representative is to act as the Plaintiff’s Next Friend in the conduct of these proceedings.</td> </tr> </table> ``` ```latex \section{21.} Mindful of the foregoing, I find that there is sufficient evidence before me to conclude that the Plaintiff is a patient within section 2 of the Act being a person “who is suffering from or is suspected to be suffering from mental impairment”. I find that the Plaintiff’s paranoid mental state and beliefs will interfere with his capacity to litigate and to understand the entirety of the proceedings. I believe that his mental state and beliefs will interfere with his ability to litigate in what is a complex and complicated case or to properly weigh up the arguments for and against litigation. The Plaintiff’s paranoid mental state and belief will also interfere with his capacity to understand a vitiating factor or factors upon which he may have to rely in the course of the instant proceedings. \section{22.} Pursuant to Order 80 r. 2 (2), the Solicitor General or her representative is to act as the Plaintiff’s Next Friend in the conduct of these proceedings.

Find similar