Williams F J
IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
The defendant, J’D
(3) *A provision in any
"While on the subject I might say a
SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE -
it soils it and so it is necessary
opened for business the following day. The
ii. a pair of blue jeans pants
Officer Rennalls testified
who recovered the footage and that it was
scenes in the Cayman Islands, about
to lift the impressions he had seen and
The process of obtaining prints
The decision not to test
She has completed and passed
i. Exhibit 6: original lifts
Ms. Noddings
She accepted that fingerprint identification
comparison. However, pressure will not change
She was also cross-ex
matched the right middle finger on the fingerprint
Fingerprint analysis is not her primary job
February 2019. He
He said he saw in
(a) *To be presumed innocent until
v. I should also bear in mind
forensic evidence and to persuade the court
found on the counter, which, if
c. I find that the prints were
i. I accept the evidence of Miss
December 2007 the appellant
a. The observations made in \( R
regard. That was not successful,
The defendant concealed the