6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4059 · pdb #1334

DC v RC (Re A) (Child Relocation) - Judgment

FAM 0252/2013 · 2020-01-29

Application for Relocation; Paramountcy of the Welfare of the Child; Parents inability to settle; medical issues. Children law; relocation; parental responsibility; welfare determinations

All PDF copies on file (3)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
20-01-29_dc_v_rc_re_a_child_relocation.pdf
1.26 MB · md5 6a6e5ef886ea7667eb8a78682af08642
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/20-01-29_dc_v_rc_re_a_child_relocation.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
75DAMV7K1PT51EB7C39EBED6D0C1192B6801B551074D7176D198.pdf
1.26 MB · md5 67104dbaa8bb044a1f93ab13195088ff
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1285 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4059 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
6BMCNS04T5N01EGBC3096DA99CBE1F1E28962BB6D9EBBC81F6CE.pdf
8.82 MB · md5 86590b7f9e2eebb2a024a368c3df4a49
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1284 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4059 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 9 Jun 2026 14:17 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #51184 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · olmocr-2-7b-1025
1,568 chars in 390282 ms
LLM extraction
local · qwen3-next:80b
parsed first try · 48485 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Cause Number FAM 0252/2013
Court CIGC (Fam)
Judge Carter J
Parties DC v RC (Re A) (Child Relocation) - Judgment
Judgment Date 2020-01-29
Subject Application for Relocation; Paramountcy of the Welfare of the Child; Parents inability to settle; medical issues. Children law; relocation; parental responsibility; welfare determinations
Filename (current) 20-01-29_dc_v_rc_re_a_child_relocation.pdf
File MD5 6a6e5ef886ea7667eb8a78682af08642
Source pipeline pdb
PDB record ID 1334
PDB URL https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/20-01-29_dc_v_rc_re_a_child_relocation.pdf
Full text2 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Family Division
Cause No. FAM 0252/2013
Between
DC
- v -
RC (Re A) (Child Relocation) - Judgment
Before
Carter J
Judgment delivered 2020-01-29

This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but

The Applicant related that she
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
He also invited the court to be cautious
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
described that she is still experiencing.
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but
This Judgment was delivered in private, but

Find similar