Judgment · jid 4130 · pdb #2131

Magdalyn Burlington v Butterfield Bank (Cayman) Ltd and McAlpine Ltd - Ruling

G 0139/2017 · 2019-08-26

Civil Practice and Procedure; Application by Defendant for Leave to Issue Third Party Notice; Whether the Dispute Resolution Procedure and Arbitration Clause Applicable; Application by Plaintiff to add proposed third party as a Defendant instead; Application for leave to issue third party notice; whether arbitration clause and dispute resolution procedure in construction contract applied to post-construction tort claims; limitation period; addition of third party as defendant; indemnity and contribution under construction contract

Download PDF AI extraction 3 flags

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT

19-08-26_magdalyn_burlington_v_butterfield_bank_cayman_ltd_et_al.pdf

686.56 KB · md5 8dab5da86b80d17bd33e27635d9ecd5d

Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/19-08-26_magdalyn_burlington_v_butterfield_bank_cayman_ltd_et_al.pdf.

CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT

PXOAWY1RX1K1E5FA2BG329C900D8DD86C0597CD244285C9BEAB.pdf

686.67 KB · md5 8374b944744bb88d7c7565aed6322462

Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1033 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4130 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 9 Jun 2026 16:19 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #51334 · quality 0.80

Text extraction

                        olmocr                                                    · olmocr-2-7b-1025                                            

925 chars in 296812 ms

LLM extraction

                        local                                                    · qwen3-next:80b                                            

parsed first try · 81765 ms

Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court

Full metadata

Cause Number	G 0139/2017
Court	CIGC (Civ)
Judge	Mangatal J
Parties	Magdalyn Burlington v Butterfield Bank (Cayman) Ltd and McAlpine Ltd - Ruling
Judgment Date	2019-08-26
Subject	Civil Practice and Procedure; Application by Defendant for Leave to Issue Third Party Notice; Whether the Dispute Resolution Procedure and Arbitration Clause Applicable; Application by Plaintiff to add proposed third party as a Defendant instead; Application for leave to issue third party notice; whether arbitration clause and dispute resolution procedure in construction contract applied to post-construction tort claims; limitation period; addition of third party as defendant; indemnity and contribution under construction contract
Filename (current)	19-08-26_magdalyn_burlington_v_butterfield_bank_cayman_ltd_et_al.pdf
File MD5	8dab5da86b80d17bd33e27635d9ecd5d
Source pipeline	pdb
PDB record ID	2131
PDB URL	https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/19-08-26_magdalyn_burlington_v_butterfield_bank_cayman_ltd_et_al.pdf

Full text4 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division

Cause No. G 0139/2017

Between

Magdalyn Burlington

- v -

Butterfield Bank (Cayman) Ltd and McAlpine Ltd - Ruling

Before
Mangatal J

Judgment delivered 2019-08-26

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
HEADNOTE Civil Practice and Procedure –
Ms. Burlington’s application of 2

Mr. Huskisson,

Mr. Huskisson
it is found that McAlpine was
costs would have been a factor in
I do not intend to go into this
Claims must be initiated by written notice.
v Aeakos [199
(Counsel’s emphasis) 28.
Mr. Huskisson asserts that none
In essence, Butterfield makes two submissions
(a) There must be an initial referral
"The initial decision pursuant to Sections A.
post construction. Accordingly, it was submitted

Reference was also made to
Butterfield therefore invite the Court to
I accept Mr. Cox’s submission that
Costs are awarded to Butterfield against

Find similar