6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4415 · pdb #1389

KD v PD and Ors _ Judgment

FAM 0110/2014 · 2017-10-30

Children Law - application for variation of consent contact order - Supervisors for supervised contact - effect of alcohol dependency on contact order - application for contact order by maternal grandparents - human rights considerations and s.10 Children Law applications - s.13(7) of the Children Law attaching directions as to how a contact order is to be carried out and imposing conditions to a contact order.

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
17-10-30_kd_v_pd__ors.pdf
2.39 MB · md5 453437c2d2eeaf95f85e534dbd8fd4e0
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/17-10-30_kd_v_pd__ors.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
3ROKMCDWUFG51DE608GD902A269A1FB2F6D1D6455FC5BB079C49.pdf
3.67 MB · md5 3c4f559aa7fc62a3035cc041c7877196
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=840 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4415 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 10 Jun 2026 06:14 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #52699 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · olmocr-2-7b-1025
3,721 chars in 754993 ms
LLM extraction
local · qwen3-next:80b
parsed first try · 119731 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text15 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Family Division
Cause No. FAM 0110/2014
Between
KD
- v -
PD and Ors _ Judgment
Before
Williams J
Judgment delivered 2017-10-30

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
Preamble

"Childhood
from an adult's point of view.
("TK") on 2 February

DM and WM also oppose the
easy, or that there is any one
in controlling its use. Someone who is
(v) Prohibited Steps Order, preventing
or for them to acquire any form of

I am satisfied that Dr
Anonymous and the protection of her sobri
routine for B in what may be regarded
(iv) The Supervising Professional is to
contact on a Wednesday evening with collection at
mother’s alcoholism and how that affected
Counsel for the father had, by
bundle filed at 4:10
reason. Any statement by counsel for the

On 22 June

At the outset of her
Court Welfare Officer is now recommending that any
monitoring to enhance her accountability with treatment
The Parties’ Positions at the Hearing in
(iii) During school holidays the schedule
(a) Mother's Day – If B

Apart from the father’s

The maternal grandparents now agree
issues, so I take this opportunity to
that a child is not separated from his
domestic authorities in the exercise of their
and development (see Elsholz
"However, the national authorities' obligation
consideration. It must point out,
and by Judge Zupancic in
of the Convention on Human Rights on a
He referred (at 733

In Re P (Children

In \( Q \ v
formation of identity and not to know the
contact. When I granted them leave for

In the case law from
overly compete with the rights and obligations
hearing the application for leave, who

The fact that leave has
the EU Kinship Carers Project across
best interests. This is a view now
(ii) whether there should be any stand
determine the factual issues that have implications
that relationship. He stated that B had
the weekend and she did not fully engage
time with his father and that his interaction

On 1 June

In her oral evidence she

The Court Welfare Officer was
presented with a seizure and admitted to
the contact between B and his mother must
B also has an important relationship with his
Regrettably there is no evidence to
The maternal grandparents are able to meet B
awkward position, balancing B’s welfare
day.\(^{17}\)
emotional harm that may be caused to
It is evident that these grandparents have a
the supervised visits were extremely important. However
visit their father at his home and B
potentially have a detrimental effect. Stability
properly. Dr. Lockhart was
would benefit from interaction with her, whether
B’s physical needs primarily due to her
being in an environment of upheaval or
then that is a matter for them.
not be such that it inappropriately
commence with B on the Saturday morning
There will be such further contact between B
(c) Parents’ birthdays – on the
conditions, which they welcomed, would assist

Find similar