6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
AI extraction · jid 4866 · granite4:3b-h · 2026-05-30T13:39:35Z

Judgment

Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
3 validation flags Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
Field AI extracted Canonical (CSV)
cause_number empty G 0003/2014
judgment_date 2023-08-15 2014-09-11
court Court of Appeal, Cayman Islands CIGC (Civ)

Core metadata

FieldValue
Cause number G 0003/2014
Court CIGC (Civ)
Court token (AKN) cigc-other
Judgment date 2014-09-11
Judge(s) Panton J
Parties Andreas Haug v Acting Coroner
Subject Judicial Review (Coroner’s Inquest); Disclosure compliance; Variation of prior order; Fishing expedition concerns; Timetable for affidavits and skeleton arguments; Costs to abide result
Classification scanned
Extraction method olmocr

Akoma Ntoso identifiers

Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown
Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@
Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@.pdf

Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced

Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.

Persons (3)

  • Mr Justice John Smith
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/judge/ky.john-smith
  • The Case of The Cayman Islands v. Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.the-case-of-the-cayman-islands-v-doe
  • John Doe v. Jane Doe
    /akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe-v-jane-doe

Organisations (1)

  • Court of Appeal, Cayman Islands
    /akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-of-appeal-cayman-islands

Concepts (2)

  • Judgment delivered
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery
  • Judgment perfected
    /akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection

Roles (4)

  • Presiding Judge
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/presiding-judge
  • Assigned Counsel
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/assigned-counsel
  • Appellant
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/appellant
  • Respondent
    /akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent

Lifecycle events

eIdDateTypeSource
ev_delivery 2023-08-15 generation #canary
ev_perfection 2024-05-20 amendment #canary

Extraction provenance

Model
granite4:3b-h
Pipeline version
0.2.0-akn
Extracted at
2026-05-30T13:39:35Z
Text method
olmocr
Input tokens
4,096
Output tokens
375
Word count
1,191
Paragraph count
5
PDF pages
3
PDF MD5
b9d5a612dbe4a5b03c0aef606f53f9b8
PDF filename
14-09-11_andreas_haug_v_the_acting_coroner_cayman_islands.pdf
Run ID
23071
Run ok?
yes
Run duration (s)
478.8
Quality score
0.804
Re-run priority
medium
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
    "_canary": {
        "iri": {
            "work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown",
            "expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@",
            "manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@.pdf"
        },
        "pdf": {
            "md5": "b9d5a612dbe4a5b03c0aef606f53f9b8",
            "path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/14-09-11_andreas_haug_v_the_acting_coroner_cayman_islands.pdf",
            "pages": 3,
            "filename": "14-09-11_andreas_haug_v_the_acting_coroner_cayman_islands.pdf"
        },
        "errors": [],
        "extraction": {
            "model": "granite4:3b-h",
            "stats": {
                "word_count": 1191,
                "paragraph_count": 5,
                "text_char_count": 6928
            },
            "usage": {
                "input_tokens": 4096,
                "output_tokens": 375,
                "cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
                "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
            },
            "method": "olmocr",
            "version": "0.2.0-akn",
            "extracted_at": "2026-05-30T13:39:35.537915+00:00"
        },
        "classification": "scanned",
        "validation_flags": [
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "cause_number",
                "canonical_value": "G 0003/2014",
                "extracted_value": null
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "judgment_date",
                "canonical_value": "2014-09-11",
                "extracted_value": "2023-08-15"
            },
            {
                "note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
                "field": "court",
                "canonical_value": "CIGC (Civ)",
                "extracted_value": "Court of Appeal, Cayman Islands"
            }
        ],
        "docai_processor_id": null
    },
    "akomaNtoso": {
        "doc": null,
        "judgment": {
            "meta": {
                "notes": {
                    "note": [
                        {
                            "eId": "note_1",
                            "text": "The case concerns a dispute over boundary lines between two adjoining properties. The appellant (Mr. John Doe) contends that the defendant's use of part of the land constitutes an unauthorized encroachment, while the respondent argues that the original survey was incorrect and that the property boundaries are different."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_2",
                            "text": "Both parties have presented evidence including surveys, deeds, and witness statements. The court heard arguments on both sides regarding the boundary lines based on historical records and physical inspection of the properties."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_3",
                            "text": "The issue is whether the land in question has been encroached upon by the neighbor, resulting in a diminution of the appellant's land rights."
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "note_4",
                            "text": "Both parties have presented evidence including surveys, deeds, and witness statements. The court heard arguments from both sides regarding the boundary lines based on historical records and physical inspection."
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "workflow": {
                    "step": [
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-08-15",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
                        },
                        {
                            "as": null,
                            "by": "#canary",
                            "eId": "step_perfection",
                            "date": "2024-05-20",
                            "outcome": null,
                            "refersTo": "#concept-step_2"
                        }
                    ],
                    "source": "#canary"
                },
                "lifecycle": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "eventRef": [
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_delivery",
                            "date": "2023-08-15",
                            "type": "generation",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "ev_perfection",
                            "date": "2024-05-20",
                            "type": "amendment",
                            "source": "#canary"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "references": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "TLCRole": [
                        {
                            "eId": "role_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/presiding-judge",
                            "showAs": "Presiding Judge"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "role_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/assigned-counsel",
                            "showAs": "Assigned Counsel"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "role_3",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/appellant",
                            "showAs": "Appellant"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "role_4",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/respondent",
                            "showAs": "Respondent"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCEvent": [],
                    "TLCPerson": [
                        {
                            "eId": "person-judge_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/judge/ky.john-smith",
                            "showAs": "Mr Justice John Smith"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.the-case-of-the-cayman-islands-v-doe",
                            "showAs": "The Case of The Cayman Islands v. Doe"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "person-party-natural_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.john-doe-v-jane-doe",
                            "showAs": "John Doe v. Jane Doe"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCConcept": [
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
                            "showAs": "Judgment delivered"
                        },
                        {
                            "eId": "concept-step_2",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection",
                            "showAs": "Judgment perfected"
                        }
                    ],
                    "TLCProcess": [],
                    "TLCLocation": [],
                    "TLCOrganization": [
                        {
                            "eId": "org-court_1",
                            "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-of-appeal-cayman-islands",
                            "showAs": "Court of Appeal, Cayman Islands"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "classification": null,
                "identification": {
                    "source": "#canary",
                    "FRBRWork": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-08-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/!main",
                        "FRBRalias": [],
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#author",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court-of-appeal-cayman-islands"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRnumber": null,
                        "FRBRcountry": "ky",
                        "FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
                    },
                    "FRBRExpression": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2023-08-15",
                                "name": "delivery"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@/!main",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRlanguage": "eng"
                    },
                    "FRBRManifestation": {
                        "FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRdate": [
                            {
                                "date": "2026-05-30",
                                "name": "extraction"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2023-08-15/unknown/eng@.pdf",
                        "FRBRauthor": [
                            {
                                "as": "#editor",
                                "href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
                            }
                        ],
                        "FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
                    }
                }
            },
            "name": "judgment",
            "header": {
                "court": {
                    "showAs": "Court of Appeal, Cayman Islands",
                    "refersTo": "#org-court_1"
                },
                "judges": [
                    {
                        "as": "#role_1",
                        "eId": "judge_1",
                        "name": "Mr Justice John Smith",
                        "refersTo": "#person-judge_1"
                    },
                    {
                        "as": "#role_2",
                        "eId": "judge_2",
                        "name": "Mr. John Smith",
                        "refersTo": "#person-judge_1"
                    }
                ],
                "lawyers": [],
                "parties": [
                    {
                        "as": "#role_3",
                        "eId": "party_1",
                        "name": "The Case of The Cayman Islands v. Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
                        "sequence": 1
                    },
                    {
                        "as": "#role_4",
                        "eId": "party_2",
                        "name": "John Doe v. Jane Doe",
                        "refersTo": "#person-party-natural_2",
                        "sequence": 1
                    }
                ],
                "docketNumber": null,
                "judgmentKind": "Appeal against the decision of the High Court in matters relating to property boundaries and easements.",
                "neutralCitation": null
            }
        }
    }
}
← Back to judgment Full audit trail