Judgment · jid 5530 · pdb #1208

R v Gifford Prendergast - Ruling

IND 0043/2009 · 2009-09-16

Admissibility of evidence

All PDF copies on file (1)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT

09-09-16_r_v_gifford_prendergast.pdf

2.82 MB · md5 ed2267fd259b32ba42dacd16414b8d77

Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/09-09-16_r_v_gifford_prendergast.pdf.

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 9 Jun 2026 23:33 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #51548 · quality 0.80

Text extraction

                        olmocr                                                    · olmocr-2-7b-1025                                            

723 chars in 224921 ms

LLM extraction

                        local                                                    · qwen3-next:80b                                            

parsed first try · 117921 ms

Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court

Full metadata

Cause Number	IND 0043/2009
Court	CIGC (Crim)
Judge	Henderson J
Parties	R v Gifford Prendergast - Ruling
Judgment Date	2009-09-16
Subject	Admissibility of evidence
Filename (current)	09-09-16_r_v_gifford_prendergast.pdf
File MD5	ed2267fd259b32ba42dacd16414b8d77
Source pipeline	pdb
PDB record ID	1208
PDB URL	https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/09-09-16_r_v_gifford_prendergast.pdf

Full text48 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Criminal Division

Cause No. IND 0043/2009

Between

- v -

Gifford Prendergast - Ruling

Before
Henderson J

Judgment delivered 2009-09-16

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C

Ruling

1 WEDNESDAY

Ruling

1 probative value of

Ruling

1 by the indictment,

Ruling

1 particular piece of evidence

Ruling

feature of similarity" and

1 911 and Rex

Ruling

1 recognised, that what

Ruling

1 the striking similarity

Ruling

by a sexual passion for

Ruling

1 to a great deal

Ruling

1 In our judgment the

Ruling

1 that process of distortion

Ruling

1 aimed at exploring the

Ruling

1 to be drawn against

Ruling

1 think it fair to

Ruling

1 engaged in by adolescent

Find similar