7,436 judgments 29,782 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

R v Travis Ebanks and Leon Clarke - Ruling

IND 0025A/2005 · 2006-02-17

Assault; joint enterprise

Full metadata
Full text21 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Criminal Division
Cause No. IND 0025A/2005
Between
R
- v -
Travis Ebanks and Leon Clarke - Ruling
Before
Henderson J
Judgment delivered 2006-02-17

THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS HOLDEN IN GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN

IND. NO. 25A OF 2005

REGINA

V.

TRAVIS EBANKS

LEON CLARKE

Appearances: Mr. Trevor Ward for the Crown
Mr. Nicholas Dixey of Quin & Hampson for the Defendant Clarke
The Defendant Ebanks, in person

Before: Hon. Justice Henderson

Heard: February 17, 2006

RULING

Leon Clarke and Travis Ebanks have been convicted of a joint enterprise: an assault upon a guard at Northward Prison in circumstances where the prison was somewhat dysfunctional. This occurred immediately after Hurricane Ivan at a time when the prison was running on emergency power. The prison was not fully staffed. There was unrest and prisoners were planning to escape, including Clarke and Ebanks. They formed a plan.

The victim, Dennis Parchment, is a prison guard who reported for duty after the hurricane. Upon entering a certain unit in the prison, he was assaulted by Mr. Ebanks with what was described as a "pipe". Parchment suffered some injuries.
Just after this assault, Mr. Clarke joined in. He managed to wrest from Mr. Parchment the keys to the prison, although they dropped on the floor. Mr. Clarke did not inflict any violence upon Parchment himself, other than the violence associated with the forceful removal of the keys from Mr. Parchment's neck.

Mr. Clarke then went outside the unit and was confronted by another prison guard. Clarke immediately demanded keys from that guard, who replied that he would not give Clarke the keys. The guard then ordered Clarke to sit down. Mr. Clarke acquiesced; he sat down and took no further part in any assaults on guards or in any attempt to escape. Those circumstances mitigate Mr. Clarke's guilt.

Mr. Ebanks has pleaded guilty and is entitled to the usual discount upon sentencing.

Assault on a prison guard is one of the most serious types of assault. Prison guards deserve and need the protection of the courts. It is essential to good order in a prison that every prisoner be well aware that any assault on a prison guard will be punished with a consecutive sentence of imprisonment and that the sentence will be substantial. Nothing less than that can accomplish the goal of maintaining order in Her Majesty's prisons.

As a matter of general principle, the sentence must be consecutive and it must be a term of imprisonment of significant length. The maximum sentence here is five years.
I do not think Mr. Ebanks deserves the maximum sentence, given the circumstances. This offence falls in the middle range of the spectrum of assaults which may be committed upon prison guards. The appropriate sentence with respect to Mr. Ebanks would be three years consecutive. From that, I deduct one year because of his guilty plea. Mr. Ebanks is sentenced to imprisonment for two years, consecutive to every sentence he is now serving.

Mr. Clarke's involvement was less serious but he does not receive any discount as he pleaded not guilty. The appropriate sentence for Mr. Clarke is a term of imprisonment of 18 months, consecutive to any sentence he is now serving. I impose that now. No time in custody is to be taken into account.

Mr. Clarke is a Jamaican citizen. I recommend that he be deported upon the completion of his sentence.

Dated this 17th day of February, 2006

Henderson, J.

Henderson, J.
Judge of the Grand Court

Find similar