Judgment · jid 6272 · pdb #2986
Benson Ebanks and O Graham Ebanks v James Floyd Reynolds; James Bartlett Reynolds; Blanche Reynolds; Burton Ebanks; Dalkeith Bothwell - Reasons for Decision
G 0224/1996 · 1996-11-12
Application to vary pedestrian right of way under Registered Land Law s.96; Interpretation of “reasonable user” and “injury” tests; Balancing proprietary rights vs commercial convenience; Evidentiary burden on applicant; Impact of proposed variation on dominant tenements; Principles from Murmarson and Strata Plan No.41 cases
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
PDB
20 May 2026
CURRENT
96-11-12-BENSON-EBANKS-v-JAMES-FLOYD-REYNOLDS.pdf
4.24 MB · md5 fe9feb3d130046021ea6df24f7b9ae4c
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/96-11-12-BENSON-EBANKS-v-JAMES-FLOYD-REYNOLDS.pdf.
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0224/1996 |
|---|---|
| Court | CIGC (Civ) |
| Judge | Murphy J |
| Parties | Benson Ebanks and O Graham Ebanks v James Floyd Reynolds; James Bartlett Reynolds; Blanche Reynolds; Burton Ebanks; Dalkeith Bothwell - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 1996-11-12 |
| Subject | Application to vary pedestrian right of way under Registered Land Law s.96; Interpretation of “reasonable user” and “injury” tests; Balancing proprietary rights vs commercial convenience; Evidentiary burden on applicant; Impact of proposed variation on dominant tenements; Principles from Murmarson and Strata Plan No.41 cases |
| Filename (current) | 96-11-12-BENSON-EBANKS-v-JAMES-FLOYD-REYNOLDS.pdf |
| File MD5 | fe9feb3d130046021ea6df24f7b9ae4c |
| Source pipeline | pdb |
| PDB record ID | 2986 |
| PDB URL | https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/96-11-12-BENSON-EBANKS-v-JAMES-FLOYD-REYNOLDS.pdf |