Schofield J
```html <table> <tr> <td>ND COURT</td> <td>GEORGE</td> </tr> <tr> <td>IN THE GI</td> <td>T OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS</td> </tr> <tr> <td>HOLDEN AT</td> <td>TOWN， GRAND CAYMAN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1992</td> <td>1992</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Cause No.</td> <td>556</td> </tr> <tr> <td>205</td> </tr> <tr> <td>INSURCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>GOWAN COMPANY</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Cause No. 356/92</td> </tr> <tr> <td>(FO</td> </tr> <tr> <td>In</td> <td>ACHRICHEM LIMITED)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>FORMERLY AGRICHEM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>AND</td> </tr> <tr> <td>INSURCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mr. Henry and J with Mr. Barrie for plain</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mr. Lamon and J with Mrs. Maierhofer for</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mr. Hill and J with Mr. Parkinson for Frit Industries Inc.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Schofield and and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>law</td> </tr> <tr> <td>These n tations have been consolidated because they arise</td> </tr> <tr> <td>out of v the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaintif called because they involve identical principles and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>issues Compani although there may be a slight difference of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>emphasis， d on application of those principles as between one</td> </tr> <tr> <td>defendant</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ite</td> </tr> <tr> <td>industri</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Agri Co. the (hereinafter referred to as "Agrichem") was</td> </tr> <tr> <td>formerly</td> </tr> <tr> <td>trib Agrichem Insurance</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Internatate dr d. ("Insurco") was incorporated on 13th May，</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1985， an</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ter 1st June of that year acquired the business of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Agrichem (</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ese companies are exempt companies incorporated</td> </tr> <tr> <td>under the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>es Law (Cap 22) and were Cr are involved in what</td> </tr> <tr> <td>is known</td> </tr> <tr> <td>aptive insurance business.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fritiqu</td> </tr> <tr> <td>es Inc. ("Frit") and Gowan Company ("Gowan") are</td> </tr> <tr> <td>United s</td> </tr> <tr> <td>corporations whose business it is to manufacture</td> </tr> <tr> <td>and/or d</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er agricultural chemicals. Frit is incorporated</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Alabama and Gowan in the State of Arizona.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Ir d</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ta</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sl</td> </tr> </table> ```
```html <html><body> <p>Agrichemth ns prided by Insurco, provided to each of the Corporat…liaboduct liability, completed operations and contractit L sucllity insurance coverage.</p> <p>Betw filed October, 1990, and 19th December, 1990, three suits we, oblig…asevision, North Carolina, alleging injuries to two dec’d ferpersons and one surviving plaintiff from contamin ta Cortilizer supplied by Frit. Frit maintains that Insurco which is ananged to provide cover for its defence of those proceedings to indemnify it in respect of any judgment given in the Hages vgs. Mutual Service Insurance Co. (“Mutual”) is an Minne Sati; whporation which also provided insurance cover to Frit, an Frit a lteFrit similarly maintains is obliged to provide defence ‘southernderlying actions and to indemnify it in respect of any c which may be awarded against it. Mutual has brought s an against, inter alia, Frit, Agrichem and Insurco in the U and orates District Court for the Middle District of Alabama,ions action Division, claiming that it is not liable to indemni claim al imagainst the claims brought in the North Carolina Proceedie brou that Frit, Agrichem and Insurco are liable to defend uj defend uj actaims and Agrichem and Insurco are liable to provide at court ty to Frit. Frit has filed an answer, counter c ind cer as against Agrichem and Insurco a cross-claim in that these ; amind an answer to Mutual’s cross-claim.</p> <p>Fourction; th; are currently pending against Gowan in the superiorio of the State of California, U.S.A. These are actions , fought by four municipalities in California alleging that Gorc is C -actured, formulated and distributed a chemical which coso seied their water supplies. Gowan maintains that Insurco d at tain other insurance companies are under a duty to defen y inactions on behalf of Gowan and to indemnify it in respect la ng jnactions which may be awarded therein. Gowan has filed an ar an the Superior Court of the State of California, var c d cont a of</p> </body></html> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>CC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in and F</td> </tr> <tr> <td>similar and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Agri at fy Insurco claim that they are not liable to defend</td> </tr> <tr> <td>or indem State t， Gowan or Mutual in the actions commenced in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the Unit which thicies and， in the case of Frit， on a further</td> </tr> <tr> <td>assertion in respehey have already paid out the policy limit for</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the year； lon-dispect of which the claims are made. In the two</td> </tr> <tr> <td>suits ill t</td> </tr> <tr> <td>that these applications are made declarations are</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sought t</td> </tr> <tr> <td>seeffect. As against Gowan there is a further</td> </tr> <tr> <td>declarat seek al</td> </tr> <tr> <td>an jht that the policies are void because of a</td> </tr> <tr> <td>material wri</td> </tr> <tr> <td>al</td> </tr> <tr> <td>closure. Leave was granted for the plaintiffs</td> </tr> <tr> <td>to serv I sho</td> </tr> <tr> <td>he defendants out of the jurisdiction. All</td> </tr> <tr> <td>defendant ru</td> </tr> <tr> <td>urge an order that such leave be discharged. Frit and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Gowan all</td> </tr> <tr> <td>claim s</td> </tr> <tr> <td>orders that the writ of summons and service of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>notice o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>e fobe set aside and that the action be dismissed.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mutual s</td> </tr> <tr> <td>claim order that the proceedings be stayed. All the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>defendant</td> </tr> <tr> <td>861</td> </tr> <tr> <td>de me that in applying the doctrine of forum non</td> </tr> <tr> <td>convenie test could hold that the Cayman Islands is not the most</td> </tr> <tr> <td>approprimate ba； n to try the action. Gowan also urges me to find</td> </tr> <tr> <td>that the cc</td> </tr> <tr> <td>should be struck out as an abuse of the process of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the Courab</td> </tr> <tr> <td>urisdiction f</td> </tr> <tr> <td>whon.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>I shtablatis with the question of forum non conveniens first.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The basi ties vailon an application such as this was laid down by</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lord Go</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Spiliada</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Maritime Corp. v Cansulex Ltd.， The</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ui 3 ALL E R 843 at 854：</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Spiliadacl</td> </tr> <tr> <td>or</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sic principle is that a stay will</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ch</td> </tr> <tr> <td>， granted on the ground of forum</td> </tr> <tr> <td>non conveniens where the Court is</td> </tr> <tr> <td>n nied that there is some other</td> </tr> <tr> <td>le forum， having competent</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ection， which is the appropriate</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>or the trial of the action， i.e.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the case may be tried more</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ns tsy for the interests of all the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t. see and the ends of justice."</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Where</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ts of the Court to serve out of the jurisdiction is</td> </tr> <tr> <td>at .so</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ff</td> </tr> </table> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>bu</td> </tr> <tr> <td>necessary the Cordon of proof lies on the plaintiff and he has to</td> </tr> <tr> <td>persuade the trust not merely that Cayman is the appropriate</td> </tr> <tr> <td>forum for the trial of the action but that it is clearly so (see</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The Spilbila p. 858).</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The trial will endeavour to ascertain with which Court the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>action has the closest real and substantial connection. As Lord Goff</td> </tr> <tr> <td>said in Tchilabodia, at p. 856:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>It is clear that the Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must first look at the effects for connecting factors in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaint. The Court must
The document appears to be a legal document, possibly a court judgment or a legal brief, discussing the insurance policies of United States corporations engaged in the agricultural chemical industry. The document is written in a formal legal style and discusses the jurisdictional issues related to the insurance policies, the shareholders' agreement, and the governing law of the policies. The text mentions that the insurance policies were provided by a captive insurance scheme in the Cayman Islands, which allowed policyholders to benefit from tax advantages. The document discusses the shareholders' agreement and the governing law of the insurance policies, which is a matter of dispute between the parties involved. The court seems to be considering the proper law to apply in interpreting the policies, with the argument being that the policies are standardised United States forms and follow the wording of forms issued out of the Insurance Office Inc. in Chicago, which is a trade association of many United States insurance companies. The document also mentions that the policies were clearly designed to cover United States corporations against risks incurred in North America. The terms of the policies have been the subject of much international litigation in the United States. The court emphasizes that the place of business is Roman, and payments are made to the Cayman Islands. The policies issued there and claims are made to and paid by a Caymanian agent/manager who is domiciled there. In short, it seems that the paperwork and accounting are carried out in the Cayman Islands. The document is stamped with the seal of the Court of Grand Cayman, indicating that it is a legal document from that court.
```html <table> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>These Islands, The plaintiffs, 6</td> <td>John Law, deposes</td> <td>CAYMAN</td> <td>ISLANDS</td> </tr> <tr> <td>at adjuster</td>
<td>His</td> <td>affidavit</td> <td>in</td> <td>indicating</td> <td>that</td> <td>the</td> <td>processing</td> <td>of</td> <td>claims</td> <td>is</td> <td>carried</td> <td>out</td> <td>of</td> <td>Cayman Islands.</td> <td>We</td> <td>do</td> <td>know</td> <td>that</td> <td>Mr.</td> <td>Law</td> <td>is</td> <td>the</td> <td>president</td> <td>Cayman National Trust Co. Ltd.</td> <td>The</td> <td>name</td> <td>plate</td> </tr> <tr> <td>both</td> <td>pl</td> <td>st co.companies</td> <td>is</td> <td>proximate</td> <td>to</td> <td>the</td> <td>office</td> <td>of</td> <td>Cay</td> <td>man</td> <td>National</td> <td>T</td> <td>rade</td> <td>Co Ltd.</td> <td>on</td> <td>the</td> <td>second</td> <td>floor</td> <td>of</td> <td>the</td> <td>West</td> <td>Wind</td> <td>Building,</td> <td>can</td> <td>own,</td> <td>but</td> <td>neither</td> <td>plaintiff</td> <td>appears</td> <td>to</td> <td>maintain</td> <td>an</td> <td>office</td> <td>rist</td> <td>jeauny</td> <td>called</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>International</td> <td>Ltd.</td> <td>Two</td> <td>di</td> <td>member</td> <td>of</td> <td>dir</td> </tr> <tr> <td>U.</td> <td>ntlemen</td> <td>fred</td> <td>l</td> <td>name</td> <td>of</td> <td>Alfred</td> <td>and</td> <td>Christopher</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>are</td> <td>Ch</td> <td>rectors</td> <td>a</td> <td>Ch company.</td> <td>Alfred</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>lives</td> <td>in</td> <td>Florida,</td> <td>in</td> <td>S.A.</td> <td>an</td> <td>chere</td> <td>a</td> <td>com</td> <td>opher</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>lives</td> <td>in</td> <td>the</td> <td>Isle</td> <td>of</td> <td>Man.</td> <td>bu</td> <td>ristophein</td> <td>in</td> <td>Fl</td> <td>is</td> <td>the</td> <td>managing</td> <td>director</td> <td>of</td> <td>both</td> <td>Agrichem</td> <td>and</td> <td>Insurco.</td> <td>One</td> <td>Don</td> <td>auman</td> <td>is</td> <td>akes</td> <td>ector</td> <td>of</td> <td>Insurco.</td> <td>All</td> <td>three</td> <td>Beaumans</td> <td>are</td> <td>rectors</td> <td>ny</td> <td>called</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>and</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>Inc.</td> <td>which</td> <td>is</td> <td>In</td> <td>corporate</td> <td>th</td> <td>orida.</td> <td>Be</td> <td>defen</td> <td>dis</td> <td>soliciting</td> <td>business</td> <td>for</td> <td>Agrichem</td> <td>and</td> <td>Beauman</td> <td>Inc.</td> <td>di</td> <td>olved</td> <td>intiffs</td> <td>in</td> <td>there</td> <td>ri</td> <td>ute</td> <td>over</td> <td>what</td> <td>exactly</td> <td>that</td> <td>involvement</td> <td>was.</td> <td>Fl</td> <td>nc</td> <td>atever</td> <td>of</td> <td>the</td> <td>of</td> <td>the</td> <td>evidence</td> <td>in</td> <td>that</td> <td>regard</td> <td>it</td> <td>would</td> <td>be</td> <td>fa</td> <td>ncif</td> <td>nciful</td> <td>ts</td> <td>na</td> <td>the</td> <td>connection</td> <td>of</td> <td>the</td> <td>officers</td> <td>of</td> <td>Agrichem</td> <td>and</td> <td>Insurco</td> <td>do</td> <td>In</td> <td>Ca</td> <td>rest</td> <td>United</td> <td>States</td> <td>of</td> <td>America.</td> <td>On</td> <td>the</td> <td>other</td> <td>hand</td> <td>In</td> <td>one</td> <td>of</td> <td>the</td> <td>slants</td> <td>have</td> <td>any</td> <td>connection</td> <td>whatsoever</td> <td>with</td> <td>the</td> <td>ayman</td> <td>Isl</td> <td>the</td> <td>a</td> <td>e</td> </tr> <tr> <td>wi</td> <td>me</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Gc</td> <td>The</td> <td>pl</td> <td>nd</td> <td>are</td> <td>exempt</td> <td>companies.</td> <td>Insurco</td> <td>has</td> <td>been</td> <td>issued</td> </tr> <tr> <td>with</td> <td>an</td> <td>by</td> <td>air</td> <td>cted</td> <td>class</td> <td>"B"</td> <td>insurance</td> <td>licence</td> <td>by</td> <td>the</td> <td>nc</td> <td>overnment</td> <td>of</td> <td>ru</td> <td>2</td> <td>Cayman</td> <td>Islands</td> <td>and</td> <td>can</td> <td>accept</td> <td>insurance</td> </tr> <tr> <td>business</td> <td>di</td> <td>er</td> <td>n</td> <td>domestic</td> <td>business.</td> <td>Agrichem</td> <td>and</td> <td>Insurco</td> <td>do</td> <td>ot</td> <td>there</td> <td>of</td> <td>ride</td> <td>insurance</td> <td>to</td> <td>any</td> <td>person</td> <td>or</td> <td>entity</td> <td>within</td> <td>the</td> <td>Cayman</td> <td>ts</td> <td>Al</td> <td>；</td> <td>they</td> <td>provide</td> <td>cover</td> <td>for</td> <td>American</td> <td>Corporations</td> <td>er</td> <td>engaged</td> <td>in</td> <td>agr</td> <td>icultural</td> <td>chemical</td> <td>industry</td> <td>in</td> <td>the</td> <td>United</td> <td>er</td> <td>for</td> <td>n</td> <td>I</td> </tr> </table> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>Amencan policyholders chose to become</td> </tr> <tr> <td>members of law. merlyman Islands companies which were governed by</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Ca]man Islands head There is no doubt that they do so to secure</td> </tr> <tr> <td>tal kation ad is for themselves.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>nt</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The ins intend</td> </tr> <tr> <td>melic is are meant to cover risks which emanate</td> </tr> <tr> <td>from North America. The individual insurance policies written</td> </tr> <tr> <td>are standard business policies carrying reference to the United</td> </tr> <tr> <td>States of America. This appears to give a clear indication that</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the parties intended the proper law of the policies to be the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>United States of America and not Cayman. It is evident that the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>plaintiffs interest lies in the United States of America. Even if</td> </tr> <tr> <td>an inference as to the inference to be drawn</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion as to the inference to be drawn</td> </tr> <tr> <td>an</td> </tr> <tr> <td>garding the relation of the parties the evidence points to a</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</td> </tr> <tr> <td>con</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conclusion to as policies have their closest and most real</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connection with the United States of America (see Rossano v.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>manufacture Insurance Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 All ER 214). I</
```html <table> <tr> <td>he</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr> <td>o</td> </tr> <tr>
```html <table> <tr> <td>IS:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>9</td> </tr> <tr> <td>lands.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in Fl directors who may be called upon to testify</td> </tr> <tr> <td>side either s or ida or the Isle of Man.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>fo：</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mutual</td> </tr> <tr> <td>aint ht into these proceedings because it chose to</td> </tr> <tr> <td>file a compary wainst， inter alia， Frit， Insurco and Agrichem</td> </tr> <tr> <td>for a decl stat injudgment that it， Mutual， is under no duty to</td> </tr> <tr> <td>fend Frit to pay underlying actions being pursued in North</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Carolina oturriche on any judgment entered therein， and that</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Insurco and whm are under such duties. In that action filed</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mu</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in the Uniania J</td> </tr> <tr> <td>on</td> </tr> <tr> <td>abama， S Division， Frit has counterclaimed against</td> </tr> <tr> <td>it</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Al</td> </tr> <tr> <td>andssibly lor aimed against Insurco and Agrichem. Thus the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Al</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ly conned vmm which Mutual has with this jurisdiction is that</td> </tr> <tr> <td>de</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sued a</td> </tr> <tr> <td>an Company in its， Mutual's， own jurisdiction.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fr</td> </tr> <tr> <td>l of MutIn</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ore thenesses are in the United States of America.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fr</td> </tr> <tr> <td>there is ] underly one witness for the plaintiffs from these</td> </tr> <tr> <td>lands.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>y to</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ers w</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Th</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Further， ut Alabama proceedings are far advanced and the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Is</td> </tr> <tr> <td>urt there) in t already determined part of the claim. It has</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in surco and Agrichem are under a duty to defend</td> </tr> <tr> <td>it in the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ping suits. It has also determined that Mutual</td> </tr> <tr> <td>is</td> </tr> <tr> <td>under able t defend Frit in two of the underlying suits.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Th</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ese are rayer which should not be relitigated in this Court.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>a</td> </tr> <tr> <td>al ar</td> </tr> <tr> <td>r ha</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Prayer</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the statement of claim in CC 205 of 1992 seeks</td> </tr> <tr> <td>declarat</td> </tr> <tr> <td>pinst Mutual and Frit that on the terms and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conditions</td> </tr> <tr> <td>of insurance issued by Mutual to Frit，</td> </tr> <tr> <td>be</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mutual is</td> </tr> <tr> <td>to defend and indemnify Frit for claims made</td> </tr> <tr> <td>th</td> </tr> <tr> <td>against Frit. It</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the underlying actions. This is an issue purely</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>between Mutual Frit and is not one which can be brought into</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ca</td> </tr> <tr> <td>is Court： r plaintiffs. If this Court made a declaration</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Co</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the terC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>and how would the order be enforceable? In any</td> </tr> <tr> <td>se the m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>e was already been partly decided by the Alabama</td> </tr> <tr> <td>court.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>nat mc</td> </tr> <tr> <td>by</td> </tr> <tr> <td>it</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ms of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Tui (</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hat Li</td> </tr> </table> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>10</td> <td>The upsw actors 11 this is that I find overwhelmingly that the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>connecting the</td> <td>of in these two suits point away from the Cayman</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Islands and arg</td> <td>Courts of the United States of America.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>co</td> <td>Counsel client ran went further than to argue that the action</td> </tr> <tr> <td>against hials's</td> <td>He be stayed on the ground of forum non</td> </tr> <tr> <td>conveniens. Ick outjed that prayers (1) and (2) in the notice of</td> <td>writ be st Mitua</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1) and</td> <td>as an abuse of the process of the Court.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Counsel f that</td> <td>1 and Frit both adopted his submissions,</td> </tr> <tr> <td>although Murred ummons seeks only a stay of proceedings.</td> <td>de</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in</td> <td>Prayershe cla t (2) of the notice of writ against Gowan claim</td> </tr> <tr> <td>to</td> <td>claration of Insurco is not liable on two policies of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ag</td> <td>surance, declar to as a master policy and an umbrella policy,</td> </tr> <tr> <td>si</td> <td>indemnid void in the underlying actions in California in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>spect of of</td> <td>hose aims made therein and also that Insurco is not</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hose aims made</td> <td>able und such an policies to defend the actions. The third</td> </tr> <tr> <td>re</td> <td>ayer for vox action that the certificates issued under those</td> </tr> <tr> <td>licies an</td> <td>act Cab initio because of a material non-disclosure</td> </tr> <tr> <td>li</td> <td>fs all under this argument. The notice of writ</td> </tr> <tr> <td>pr ainst Muthims</td> <td>Frit seeks three declarations of non-liability</td> </tr> <tr> <td>po</td> <td>to an'tn'st attacked by Gowan under this head of argument</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mil ar to w</td> <td>of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sa</td> <td>ve that lsdicti prayer seeks a declaration on the ground that</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ve that</td> <td>the plaintiff'se incure already paid out the policy limits for the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the</td> <td>year in res had hatic which the claim is made.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>laral</td> <td>In Thezerland [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 361 at p 371</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Kerr L.J. f</td> <td>to say:</td> </tr> <tr> <td>lt</td> <td>for declarations， and</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ho</td> <td>negative declarations， must be</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ps</td> <td>with great caution in all</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ne</td> <td>sttu f involving possible conflict of</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ins</td> <td>ru ons， since they obviously lend</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ne</td> <td>sh or</td> </tr> <tr> <td>sh ter</td> <td>to improper attempts at forum</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>er</td> <td>sh</td>
```html <table> <tr> <td>3</td> <td>11</td> </tr> </table> <p>is to sayio</p> <p>apat p.</p> <p>"In tte to the considerations which, que arart from these matters, are</p> <p>ge arart relevant to the approach of our</p> <p>cority e to claims for negative</p> <p>depassicns, in particular declarations</p> <p>of electioneability. There is clear</p> <p>auce but that these will be viewed with</p> <p>grace dictiion, particularly where they</p> <p>ar K</p> <p>he contact of an international</p> <p>judgements.</p> <p>stment.</p> <p>Th</p> <p>cc thi5] 2</p> <p>ju</p> <p>defen</p> <p>one.B.</p> <p>536， at pp.</p> <p>564-565， which</p> <p>th</p> <p>made， Lord Justice Pickford (later</p> <p>Will dale) said：</p> <p>decla</p> <p>ink that a declaration that</p> <p>prepa</p> <p>ink is not liable in an</p> <p>effecting or possible action is</p> <p>which will hardly ever be</p> <p>the f case the person asking it</p> <p>a pur be left to set up his</p> <p>the f verce in the action when it</p> <p>verrought...but taking the</p> <p>such view that I do of the</p> <p>oles</p> <p>t of Order XXV Rule 5</p> <p>refere rch deals with the grant of</p> <p>retref rations-] I am not</p> <p>eeding of the Court in a</p> <p>[Irs exceptional case to make</p> <p>erced to act of its being asked for</p> <p>wa</p> <p>pose which the Court does</p> <p>. fact tpprove does not take away</p> <p>ly on power to make it， but only</p> <p>ictberto reason to refuse it.</p> <p>abilwell</p> <p>Red ： it</p> <p>riyince to the purpose of which the</p> <p>cc</p> <p>ttednot approve involved concurrent</p> <p>paratros in the United States in which</p> <p>thumstarli of the parties were again</p> <p>reming jier influence by bring the English</p> <p>ac</p> <p>Ir t</p> <p>a cotton oil Co. v. Granadex</p> <p>Suit a 1976 2 Lloyd's Rep. 10 Lord</p> <p>Wite eanes referred to the Hannay case</p> <p>adgnrisunown but confused. In saying</p> <p>th</p> <p>pris confusing he was referring to</p> <p>th</p> <p>mpri hat the issue in Hannay turned</p> <p>ma</p> <p>1th the question of the Court's</p> <p>ju</p> <p>ercon to grant a declaration of</p> <p>no</p> <p>ity at all. That question was</p> <p>an</p> <p>in the affirmative by the</p> <p>ma</p> <p>re</p> <p>But they left open and</p> <p>the issue whether such a</p> <p>de</p> <p>hould in fact be granted in</p> <p>cie</p> <p>le</p> <p>ces where the plaintiff</p> <p>chirA.ve t was the defendant in foreign</p> <p>ns</p> <p>ntbur</p> <p>nswat</p> <p>scic</p> <p>ic</p> <p>iric</p> <p>ic</p> <p>la</p> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>12</td> <td>principles of the same dispute was made</td> </tr> <tr> <td>agreement. The tenor of the judgments</td> </tr> <tr> <td>of Justices Pickford and Bankes in</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the case clearly against the view that</td> </tr> <tr> <td>a declaration such a declaration should be</td> </tr> <tr> <td>avoided or indirect means of avoiding or</td> </tr> <tr> <td>intervening the foreign proceedings. But</td> </tr> <tr> <td>the alternative was left open because the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>judgments decide it was considered not</td> </tr> <tr> <td>to be the Court and because there</td> </tr> <tr> <td>was a claim for an injunction</td> </tr> <tr> <td>against the defendants in the English</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceedings to restrain them from</td> </tr> <tr> <td>co-operating with the American proceedings,</td> </tr> <tr> <td>which of the two go to trial in any event."</td> </tr> <tr> <td>The jurisdiction of the Grand Court to grant declarations is,</td> </tr> <tr> <td>clearly that of the English Courts. But it is clear</td> </tr> <tr> <td>that we must exercise great caution before granting negative</td> </tr> <tr> <td>declarations of this kind sought by the plaintiffs in this case.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>We have already parsed many of the factors which would operate</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in the proceedings in California and Alabama. Although the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceedings in California and Alabama were filed in California in the month</td> </tr> <tr> <td>allowing the suit in this jurisdiction, Gowan had</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceeded to court in this jurisdiction, Insurco that it intended to have</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceedings in the United States if its claims</td> </tr> <tr> <td>for the United States of America would be bound by them.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Further it is clear that the declarations would or at least could</td> </tr> <tr> <td>present embarrassment to those Courts. As I have already said,</td> </tr> <tr> <td>there being insurance companies involved in both the</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceedings in California and in Alabama, there would be a risk</td> </tr> <tr> <td>of conflicts between the Grand Court and those Courts</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in the interest of the same or similar insurance policies.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>So I think it has a claim in the California proceedings for</td> </tr> <tr> <td>each of the parties which is not known to our law and which will</td> </tr> <tr> <td>proceed in any case to matter what the outcome of the proceedings</td> </tr> <tr> <td>in the Grand Court.</td> </tr> </table> ```
```html <table> <tr> <td>13</td> <td>the plaintiffs cannot hope to resolve all</td> </tr> <tr> <td>cases be The</td> <td>California and Alabama Courts in this</td> </tr> <tr> <td>jurisdiction these</td> <td>they merely seek to have some of those issues</td> </tr> <tr> <td>litigated</td> <td>jurisdiction. They appear to be forum</td> </tr> <tr> <td>shopping. proced</td> <td>t</td> </tr> </table> For all that reasons I accept the contention of the defendants litigious prayers for negative declarations are an abuse of the Court. One finds by ter ought to be dealt with. Gowan and Frit generally entered clot ent all appearances and thus did not submit themselves to our Court's jurisdiction. Mutual entered a general app[1990] and has thus submitted to the jurisdiction. It is argued (see plaintiffs that Mutual may only be granted a stay and is proceditied to an order setting aside leave to serve t of the end direction. As pointed out by counsel for Mutual stir jurisdiction j as Kuwait Asia Bank EC v. National Mutual Life ou minees Ltd[applica on] 3 All ER 404， 416). Mutual did not claim that its sumdants far there was anything wrong with the writ； it jutacked the se not aside a ction dismissed. But it is proper for Mutual to apply no or a stay of these proceedings but also for an order sett rs t， the leave to serve out of the jurisdiction， these being ations going to matters of proceeding (see for ample， Re[ Buenos Aires] Ltd. (No 2) [1991] 4 All ER 548， 351). For 6tDa The de in both suits， Gowan， Mutual and Frit， will ve the onl y seek and also their costs. ``` ```latex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{graphicx} \section{Introduction} The plaintiffs cannot hope to resolve all cases in the California and Alabama Courts in this jurisdiction. They merely seek to have some of those issues litigated. They appear to be forum shopping. proced t For all that reasons I accept the contention of the defendants litigious prayers for negative declarations are an abuse of the Court. One finds by ter ought to be dealt with. Gowan and Frit generally entered clot ent all appearances and thus did not submit themselves to our Court's jurisdiction. Mutual entered a general app[1990] and has thus submitted to the jurisdiction. It is argued (see plaintiffs that Mutual may only be granted a stay and is proceditied to an order setting aside leave to serve t of the end direction. As pointed out by counsel for Mutual stir jurisdiction j as Kuwait Asia Bank EC v. National Mutual Life ou minees Ltd[applica on] 3 All ER 404， 416). Mutual did not claim that its sumdants far there was anything wrong with the writ； it jutacked the se not aside a ction dismissed. But it is proper for Mutual to apply no or a stay of these proceedings but also for an order sett rs t， the leave to serve out of the jurisdiction， these being ations going to matters of proceeding (see for ample， Re[ Buenos Aires] Ltd. (No 2) [1991] 4 All ER 548， 351). For 6tDa The de in both suits， Gowan， Mutual and Frit， will ve the onl y seek and also their costs.