7,436 judgments 29,782 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

R v Petula Twinn - Ruling

IND 0003/1989 · 1989-06-05

Theft

Full metadata
Full text9 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Criminal Division
Cause No. IND 0003/1989
Between
R
- v -
Petula Twinn - Ruling
Before
Schofield J
Judgment delivered 1989-06-05

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS
HOLDEN AT GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN.

IND. #: 3/89

MR. SHEEHAN FOR CROWN.
MR. PHIPPS AND MR. POLACK FOR ACCUSED.

REGINA V. PETULA TWINN.

RULING.

The manner in which it is alleged that the accused perpetrated theft is that, she being responsible for selling airline tickets, would extract the airlines copies of tickets which she had sold for cash, destroy those copies and take the cash equivalent of the tickets. It is said she did this in respect of four tickets which she had sold at the City Ticket Office of Cayman Airways (which represents the first count) and in respect of about 20 tickets which she sold at the Airport Sales Office (which represents the second count). Each extraction of cash represents a separate theft. This is not a situation where the very nature of the theft makes it impossible to determine that any particular amount was taken on any particular day. It may be that the nature of the accounting makes it difficult for the prosecution to prove every one of the alleged incidents of theft, but that does not alter the individual nature of the accused's actions.

The accused was not to account for a number of cash transactions at the end of a given period having extracted from the balance due a proportion of the cash to be accounted for. This is not a general deficiency situation. Each act of taking the cash equivalent of a ticket or tickets at any given time constituted a separate theft.

Accordingly I consider the two counts in the indictment to be bad for duplicity and I quash the indictment.
The accused is discharged.

5th June, 1989

Find similar