Judgment · jid 798
Her Majesty The Queen v. David Tamasa and George Eric Mignott
CICA (CRIM) APPEAL NO. 0006 AND 0008 OF 2015 · 2017-Mar-06
Criminal Law - Leave to Appeal against conviction & Appeal against sentence and conviction - Whether jury entitled or should have convicted applicant of robbery when evidence implicating him was fundamentally dependend on evidence of accomplice
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
G7YKSDS269S1DE607G1F44368A29569503F3799C3AE560B9C8F.pdf
148.71 KB · md5 1ffbf8738291fb158a4f8018c73305d1
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=798 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4548 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | CICA (CRIM) APPEAL NO. 0006 AND 0008 OF 2015 |
|---|---|
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 2017-Mar-06 |
| Subject | Criminal Law - Leave to Appeal against conviction & Appeal against sentence and conviction - Whether jury entitled or should have convicted applicant of robbery when evidence implicating him was fundamentally dependend on evidence of accomplice |
| Category | Criminal |
| Filename (current) | G7YKSDS269S1DE607G1F44368A29569503F3799C3AE560B9C8F.pdf |
| File MD5 | 1ffbf8738291fb158a4f8018c73305d1 |
| Source pipeline | csv |